I came here as a practical man, to talk, not simply on the question of peace and war, but to treat another question which is of hardly less importance - the enormous and burdensome standing armaments which it is the practice of modern Governments to sustain in time of peace.

Profession: Businessman

Topics: Peace, Time, War, Importance, Man, Practice, Question, Talk,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 29
Meaning: The quote "I came here as a practical man, to talk, not simply on the question of peace and war, but to treat another question which is of hardly less importance - the enormous and burdensome standing armaments which it is the practice of modern Governments to sustain in time of peace" by Richard Cobden, a businessman and influential figure in the 19th-century British politics, reflects his stance on the issue of standing armaments and their implications for peace and war. This quote is from a speech that Cobden delivered at the Peace Conference in Edinburgh in 1853.

Richard Cobden was a leading advocate of free trade and a staunch opponent of protectionism and militarism. He is best known for his role in the formation of the Cobden-Chevalier Treaty in the 1860s, which significantly reduced trade barriers between Britain and France. However, his concerns extended beyond economic matters to encompass broader political and social issues, including the impact of militarization on society.

In this quote, Cobden expresses his practical approach to addressing the issue of peace and war, emphasizing the significance of dealing with the "enormous and burdensome standing armaments" that modern governments maintain during peacetime. He highlights the paradox of governments investing heavily in military capabilities and armaments while ostensibly pursuing peace. Cobden's perspective reflects a deep skepticism towards the prevailing militaristic policies of his time and a commitment to promoting non-interventionist and peaceful resolutions to conflicts.

Cobden's emphasis on the "enormous and burdensome" nature of standing armaments underscores the economic and social costs associated with maintaining large military forces during peacetime. He was a vocal critic of the heavy financial burden imposed on taxpayers to fund these standing armies, arguing that the resources diverted to military spending could be more effectively utilized for productive and beneficial purposes. Furthermore, he believed that the existence of large standing armies created a perpetual state of tension and insecurity, potentially escalating into armed conflicts.

Cobden's views on standing armaments were shaped by his broader philosophy of international relations and the pursuit of peace through diplomacy and commercial ties. He firmly believed that free trade and peaceful cooperation between nations could foster mutual prosperity and reduce the likelihood of conflicts. In his advocacy for disarmament and non-intervention, Cobden sought to challenge the prevailing militaristic mindset and promote a more pragmatic and peaceful approach to international relations.

The historical context in which Cobden delivered this quote is crucial for understanding its significance. The mid-19th century was marked by significant geopolitical tensions, including the Crimean War and the heightened rivalry among major European powers. Cobden's speech at the Peace Conference in Edinburgh occurred against the backdrop of these turbulent times, underscoring the urgency of addressing the underlying causes of conflict and the need for a more enlightened approach to statecraft.

In conclusion, Richard Cobden's quote encapsulates his pragmatic and critical perspective on the issue of standing armaments and their implications for peace and war. His emphasis on the economic, social, and security costs of maintaining large military forces during peacetime reflects his broader commitment to promoting peaceful and non-interventionist policies. Cobden's insights continue to resonate in contemporary debates on military expenditure, arms control, and the pursuit of international peace and security.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)