Meaning: The quote, "The idea of writer as sage is pretty much dead today. I would certainly feel very uncomfortable in the role," by J. M. Coetzee, challenges the traditional perception of writers as moral or intellectual authorities. Coetzee, a renowned South African novelist and Nobel laureate, expresses his discomfort with the expectation that writers should be revered as wise and insightful figures. This sentiment reflects a shift in the way writers are perceived in contemporary society and raises important questions about the role of literature and the responsibilities of writers.

In the past, writers were often regarded as sages or seers, revered for their ability to impart profound wisdom and moral guidance through their works. This perception can be traced back to ancient times, when poets and storytellers were seen as the conveyors of cultural and ethical knowledge. Throughout history, writers such as Shakespeare, Goethe, and Tolstoy have been elevated to the status of moral authorities, their words and ideas shaping the ethical and intellectual landscape of their respective eras.

However, Coetzee's assertion that the idea of writer as sage is obsolete suggests a departure from this traditional view. In today's world, the authority and influence of writers have been decentralized and diversified. The proliferation of diverse voices and perspectives in literature has challenged the notion of a singular, all-knowing writer figure. Moreover, the democratization of publishing and the rise of digital media have made it easier for individuals from varied backgrounds and experiences to share their stories and insights, further diluting the idea of the writer as an exclusive source of wisdom.

Coetzee's discomfort with the role of the writer as sage may also be linked to the increasing complexity of ethical and intellectual discourse in contemporary society. As the world becomes more interconnected and diverse, the idea of a single writer possessing all-encompassing wisdom becomes untenable. Instead, writers are seen as contributors to a broader conversation, offering their perspectives and insights within a larger tapestry of human experience.

Furthermore, the skepticism towards the writer as sage can be seen as a reaction to the potential dangers of placing too much trust in the authority of individual writers. History has shown that writers, like any other individuals, are fallible and susceptible to bias, error, and moral ambiguity. Coetzee's discomfort may stem from a recognition of the limitations and complexities inherent in the act of writing, as well as a reluctance to be placed on a pedestal that obscures these nuances.

In today's literary landscape, the role of the writer has evolved into one of multiplicity and diversity. Writers are no longer expected to serve as the sole arbiters of truth and wisdom, but rather as participants in a dynamic and ongoing dialogue about the human experience. This shift reflects a broader cultural movement towards inclusivity, plurality, and the recognition of diverse perspectives.

In conclusion, J. M. Coetzee's quote challenges the traditional perception of writers as sages and highlights the evolving role of writers in contemporary society. The idea of the writer as a singular, all-knowing authority has given way to a more complex and diverse understanding of the writer's role. Writers are now seen as contributors to a broader conversation, offering their perspectives and insights within a larger tapestry of human experience. This shift reflects a more inclusive and democratic approach to literature and intellectual discourse, acknowledging the multiplicity of voices and the complexities of the human condition.