Meaning:
This quote by Morris Cohen, a prominent American philosopher, touches on the inherent presence of creativity in great systems and the impossibility of eliminating human emotion and will from any philosophy. In this quote, Cohen suggests that creativity and human emotions play a significant role in shaping philosophical systems, and it is unlikely that any philosophy can completely rid itself of these fundamental aspects of human nature.
Cohen's assertion about the presence of a creative element in great systems points to the idea that innovative and original thinking is essential for the development of influential and impactful philosophical frameworks. Great systems, whether they are philosophical, scientific, or artistic, often involve creative thinking and novel ideas that challenge existing norms and paradigms. This creativity can manifest in various forms, including the ability to think outside the box, make connections between seemingly disparate concepts, and propose new ways of understanding the world.
Furthermore, Cohen's statement about the impossibility of eliminating sympathy or fundamental attitudes of will from any human philosophy underscores the deeply rooted nature of human emotions and will in shaping philosophical perspectives. Human beings are inherently emotional and willful creatures, and these aspects of our nature inevitably influence our philosophical beliefs and outlook on the world. Whether it is compassion, empathy, or a sense of justice, our fundamental attitudes of will and emotions are integral to the development of philosophical systems.
In discussing the role of creativity and human emotions in philosophy, Cohen challenges the notion that philosophy can or should strive to be purely rational and detached from human experiences. While rationality and logical reasoning are crucial components of philosophical inquiry, Cohen's perspective highlights the importance of acknowledging and embracing the human element in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. By recognizing the impact of creativity and human emotions, philosophers can strive to develop more holistic and relatable systems of thought that resonate with people's lived experiences.
Cohen's quote also prompts reflection on the dynamic nature of philosophical inquiry. As human knowledge and understanding evolve, so too do philosophical systems. The presence of a creative element in great systems suggests that philosophy is not static but rather a living, breathing discipline that continues to adapt and grow over time. This adaptability allows philosophy to remain relevant and responsive to the changing needs and concerns of humanity.
Moreover, Cohen's assertion raises questions about the relationship between creativity, emotions, and rationality in philosophical discourse. How do these elements interact and intersect in the development of philosophical ideas? Can creativity and emotions enhance or detract from the rigor and validity of philosophical arguments? These questions invite further exploration and debate within the philosophical community, offering opportunities for scholars to delve deeper into the complex interplay of creativity, emotions, and rationality in philosophical thought.
In conclusion, Morris Cohen's quote serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the role of creativity and human emotions in shaping philosophical systems. By emphasizing the presence of a creative element and the impossibility of eliminating fundamental human attitudes from philosophy, Cohen encourages a reexamination of the relationship between rationality and the human experience within philosophical inquiry. This quote invites us to consider the dynamic and multifaceted nature of philosophy, and the ways in which creativity and emotions contribute to the ongoing evolution of philosophical thought.