Meaning: The quote by Juan Cole, an educator and commentator on Middle Eastern affairs, highlights his concern about the influence of right-wing think tanks on policy discussions. Cole suggests that these organizations have gained undue prominence and wield significant influence despite producing what he describes as "shoddy studies and policy recommendations." This observation raises important questions about the role of think tanks in shaping public discourse and policy formation.

Think tanks are research organizations that aim to influence public policy by providing analysis and recommendations on a wide range of issues. They often have specific ideological or political leanings, and their work can have a significant impact on public debate and decision-making. In recent decades, right-wing think tanks have become increasingly influential in shaping policy discussions, particularly in areas such as economic and social policy.

One of the key concerns raised by Cole is the quality of the research and recommendations produced by these right-wing think tanks. He suggests that their studies are "shoddy," implying that they may lack rigor, objectivity, or intellectual honesty. This raises important questions about the credibility and integrity of the research being used to inform policy decisions. If influential think tanks are producing substandard work, it could have serious implications for the quality of public policy.

Furthermore, Cole's assertion that these shoddy studies and recommendations are "nevertheless taken very seriously" points to a broader issue of how ideas and research are received and utilized in public discourse. It suggests that despite the potential flaws in the work of these think tanks, their influence and credibility remain high. This raises questions about the mechanisms through which certain voices and perspectives are privileged in public debates, and the potential consequences of such imbalances of influence.

The dominance of right-wing think tanks in policy discussions also raises questions about diversity of perspectives and expertise. If certain ideological or political positions are disproportionately represented in the think tank landscape, it could limit the range of ideas and policy options that are considered in public debates. This could have implications for the inclusivity and effectiveness of the policy-making process.

In responding to Cole's concerns, it is important to consider the broader context in which think tanks operate. These organizations often rely on funding from external sources, such as corporations, foundations, or wealthy individuals. This can raise questions about the potential for conflicts of interest and the extent to which think tanks are truly independent in their research and recommendations.

In conclusion, Juan Cole's quote highlights important issues related to the influence of right-wing think tanks on policy discussions. It raises questions about the quality of research and recommendations produced by these organizations, as well as the broader implications for public discourse and policy-making. As we consider the role of think tanks in shaping public policy, it is essential to critically evaluate the credibility, diversity, and independence of the research and ideas they produce.