Meaning: The quote "Willing or preferring is the same with respect to good and evil, that judging is with respect to truth or falsehood" by Anthony Collins, a philosopher, addresses the concept of volition and preference in relation to morality and ethical judgment. Anthony Collins (1676-1729) was an English philosopher known for his contributions to the fields of ethics, religion, and free will. His writings often explored the intersections of reason, morality, and human agency.

In this quote, Collins appears to be drawing a parallel between the act of willing or preferring and the act of judging, suggesting that they share a similar function in different domains. To understand the deeper meaning of this quote, it is important to unpack the concepts of willing, preferring, judging, and their implications in relation to good and evil, as well as truth and falsehood.

When Collins refers to "willing or preferring," he is likely alluding to the human capacity to make choices and decisions based on personal inclinations or desires. Willingness can be understood as the readiness or consent to engage in a particular action or accept a certain outcome, while preference involves the selection of one option over others based on individual tastes or values. In the realm of morality, the choices individuals make and the preferences they hold can significantly influence their ethical conduct and decision-making processes.

The phrase "with respect to good and evil" highlights the ethical dimension of Collins' statement. By linking willing and preferring to good and evil, he seems to be suggesting that our volitional and preferential capacities are intimately tied to our moral considerations. This implies that our choices and preferences are not only influenced by personal desires but also by our understanding of what is morally right or wrong. In other words, our willingness and preferences are not neutral actions but are closely intertwined with ethical considerations.

Similarly, Collins draws a parallel between willing or preferring and judging, indicating that the act of making choices or expressing preferences can be likened to the act of rendering judgments. Just as judging is tied to the discernment of truth or falsehood, willing and preferring are linked to the evaluation of good and evil. This parallel underscores the significance of personal agency and discernment in ethical decision-making. It suggests that just as individuals are responsible for making moral judgments, they are also accountable for their volitional and preferential actions.

Furthermore, the quote prompts reflection on the nature of truth and falsehood in relation to moral decision-making. Collins' juxtaposition of judging with respect to truth or falsehood with willing or preferring with respect to good and evil implies a correspondence between the domains of ethics and epistemology. It suggests that just as individuals engage in the pursuit of truth and the avoidance of falsehood through judgment, they also navigate the moral landscape by willing what is good and preferring it over what is evil.

Collins' philosophical insights in this quote invite contemplation on the interconnectedness of human agency, morality, and truth-seeking. By aligning the acts of willing, preferring, and judging with ethical and epistemic considerations, he underscores the profound implications of personal choice and discernment in shaping our moral and intellectual lives.

In conclusion, Anthony Collins' quote "Willing or preferring is the same with respect to good and evil, that judging is with respect to truth or falsehood" offers a thought-provoking perspective on the relationship between volition, preference, judgment, and ethical discernment. It encourages us to consider the profound implications of our choices, preferences, and judgments in navigating the moral and epistemic complexities of human existence.