Meaning: This quote by William Ames, a 17th-century philosopher, delves into the concept of ideas and their origin in both humans and in God. The quote suggests that in humans, ideas are first impressed upon them and then expressed in their actions or creations. However, in God, ideas are only expressed, not impressed, as they do not come from anywhere else.

To delve deeper into this quote, it's important to understand the philosophical implications of the distinction between the human and divine origins of ideas. The idea of ideas being "impressed" upon humans suggests an external source or influence that shapes their thoughts and creativity. This aligns with the concept of human perception and experience shaping their understanding of the world, leading to the expression of ideas through their actions, inventions, or expressions.

On the other hand, the notion that in God, ideas are only expressed, not impressed, reflects a belief in the divine as the ultimate source of all ideas. This concept is rooted in the theological understanding of God as the creator of all things, including the fundamental concepts and ideas that shape the universe. In this context, ideas are seen as inherent to the nature of God and are expressed through the divine will and power, rather than being influenced or shaped by external sources.

The quote also touches upon the difference between the human and divine nature. For humans, the process of receiving and expressing ideas implies a sense of dependence on external stimuli and influences. This aligns with the philosophical concept of human beings as finite, limited creatures, whose ideas and actions are shaped by their interactions with the world around them.

Conversely, the idea that in God, ideas are only expressed highlights the divine attributes of self-sufficiency and independence. It suggests that God's ideas are inherent to the divine nature and do not originate from any external source. This aligns with the theological understanding of God as infinite and self-existent, possessing all perfections within Himself.

Overall, the quote by William Ames prompts contemplation on the nature of ideas and their origin in both humans and in God. It invites philosophical and theological reflection on the source of creativity, the relationship between the finite and the infinite, and the fundamental differences between human and divine attributes.

In conclusion, William Ames' quote encapsulates profound philosophical and theological insights into the origin and expression of ideas in humans and in God. It prompts contemplation on the nature of creativity, the relationship between the finite and the infinite, and the fundamental distinctions between human and divine attributes.