Meaning: This quote by Barbara Amiel, a Canadian journalist and writer, offers an interesting perspective on the military capabilities and economic needs of the People's Republic of China in comparison to the former Soviet Union. Amiel suggests that China has not yet achieved the same level of military strength as the Soviet Empire, but with additional time and support from the Western world, particularly in the form of aid, loans, technology, and tourism, it could potentially reach a similar level of power.

The comparison between the military might of China and the Soviet Union is significant in understanding the geopolitical landscape and power dynamics during the time when the quote was made. The Soviet Union was a dominant global superpower with formidable military strength, exerting influence over Eastern Europe and engaging in a prolonged Cold War rivalry with the United States. China, on the other hand, was undergoing significant economic and political transformations as it sought to modernize and expand its influence on the world stage.

Amiel's assertion that China requires "a little more time" suggests that she sees the potential for China to continue growing and strengthening its military capabilities. This reflects the understanding that military power is not static, and nations have the capacity to advance and evolve over time. The reference to the need for "infusion of Western aid, loans, technology and the hard currency of our tourists" underscores the importance of external support and resources in facilitating China's military development. This highlights the interconnectedness of global economies and the role of international cooperation in shaping the trajectory of nations' military capabilities.

The mention of "Western aid" and "technology" also hints at the potential transfer of knowledge, resources, and expertise from more developed Western nations to China. This aligns with the broader narrative of technology transfer and economic engagement between China and Western countries, which has been a significant aspect of China's rise as a global economic and military power in recent decades.

Furthermore, the inclusion of "the hard currency of our tourists" in the quote reflects the recognition of the economic impact of tourism and international travel. This suggests an acknowledgment of the role that tourism and foreign currency exchange can play in supporting China's economic growth and potentially contributing to its military development.

Amiel's perspective, as articulated in the quote, reflects the complexities of international relations and the multifaceted nature of military power. It also underscores the evolving dynamics of global power shifts and the interplay of economic, technological, and geopolitical factors in shaping the capabilities of nations on the world stage.

In conclusion, Barbara Amiel's quote offers a thought-provoking insight into the military and economic considerations surrounding the People's Republic of China in comparison to the Soviet Empire. It prompts consideration of the interplay between military strength, economic support, and international engagement in shaping the trajectory of nations' power and influence. The quote serves as a reminder of the evolving nature of global power dynamics and the role of external factors in shaping the military capabilities of nations.