Meaning: The quote you provided touches on the Peterson family's response to the media coverage surrounding the trial of Scott Peterson, who was convicted of the murder of his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn child. The quote suggests that the Peterson family has chosen to remain out of the public eye, possibly due to their belief that the media played a significant role in Scott's conviction.

The case of Scott Peterson and the murder of Laci Peterson garnered widespread media attention and public interest. The couple's disappearance in December 2002, Laci's pregnancy, and the subsequent discovery of her body and that of her unborn child in April 2003 captivated the nation. The media coverage surrounding the case was intense and often sensationalized, with many outlets portraying Scott Peterson as guilty long before his trial began.

Catherine Crier, a respected journalist and legal commentator, likely made this statement as a reflection of the Peterson family's perspective on the media's role in the case. It is not uncommon for families of high-profile criminal defendants to feel that media coverage has unfairly influenced public opinion and legal proceedings.

The decision of the Peterson family to remain silent in the wake of Scott's conviction speaks to the impact of media scrutiny on individuals thrust into the public eye during a high-profile criminal trial. The family may have chosen to refrain from engaging with the media as a means of coping with the trauma of the case and the loss of their loved ones.

In high-profile criminal cases, media coverage can have a profound influence on public perception and the legal process. The saturation of news coverage, often combined with speculation and sensationalism, can shape public opinion and potentially prejudice the jury pool. As a result, the accused and their families may feel that they are being tried in the court of public opinion long before their case reaches a courtroom.

The Peterson family's decision to avoid the press may also be a reflection of their desire for privacy and the need to shield themselves from the intense scrutiny and judgment that often accompany media attention in such cases. The loss of a family member under tragic circumstances is an incredibly difficult experience, and the added pressure of media intrusion can exacerbate the pain and grief.

Catherine Crier's observation underscores the complex relationship between the media, the justice system, and the personal lives of those involved in high-profile criminal cases. The Peterson family's decision to eschew media engagement may be an attempt to reclaim a sense of privacy and autonomy in the face of overwhelming public interest.

In conclusion, the quote provided sheds light on the Peterson family's response to the media coverage surrounding Scott Peterson's trial and conviction. It highlights the potential impact of media scrutiny on individuals involved in high-profile criminal cases and offers insight into the complexities of navigating public attention in the aftermath of a tragedy.