Meaning: The quote by Aleister Crowley touches on the tendency of society to view those who investigate controversial or unconventional ideas as somehow being associated with the subject matter they are studying. The analogy he uses, comparing the investigation of heresies to a doctor studying leprosy, highlights the judgment and suspicion that often accompanies intellectual exploration outside of accepted norms. The quote also points out the historical reluctance to allow scientific inquiry to proceed without reproach, suggesting a broader skepticism towards the pursuit of knowledge that challenges established beliefs.

In his statement, Crowley critiques the prevailing attitudes that cast doubt on those who seek to understand and explore unconventional or dissenting ideas. The notion that the conscience of the world is "so guilty" suggests an underlying discomfort with the act of questioning established beliefs and the potential for such inquiries to disrupt societal norms. This sentiment reflects the historical and ongoing resistance to change and innovation, as well as the fear of being associated with ideas that challenge prevailing dogma.

The comparison of those investigating heresies to heretics highlights the tendency to conflate the pursuit of knowledge with an endorsement of the subject matter being studied. This conflation can lead to suspicion, ostracization, and even persecution of individuals who engage in intellectual exploration outside the boundaries of accepted beliefs. The implication is that the mere act of inquiry is seen as a threat to the status quo, and those who engage in such inquiry are viewed with suspicion and mistrust.

Crowley's reference to science being allowed to study anything "without reproach" only recently underscores the historical barriers to unfettered scientific inquiry. Throughout history, scientific progress has often been hindered by societal, religious, and political constraints that sought to control and dictate the boundaries of acceptable knowledge. The quote suggests that even the pursuit of scientific knowledge has been subject to scrutiny and censure, further reinforcing the broader theme of resistance to intellectual exploration.

This quote encapsulates the broader struggle between established authority and the pursuit of knowledge that challenges the prevailing order. It highlights the societal tendency to vilify those who question accepted beliefs and the difficulty of engaging in intellectual exploration without being branded as a heretic or outsider. The quote serves as a reminder of the enduring challenges faced by individuals and communities who seek to expand the boundaries of understanding and knowledge.

In conclusion, Aleister Crowley's quote provides a thought-provoking commentary on the societal attitudes towards intellectual exploration and the challenges faced by those who seek to investigate unconventional ideas. It underscores the historical resistance to change and the tendency to cast suspicion on individuals who venture beyond the confines of accepted beliefs. The quote serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle between established authority and the pursuit of knowledge that challenges the prevailing order.