Meaning: The quote by Javier Cuadros, a scientist, raises an important point about the complexity and controversy surrounding the topic of man-made global warming. Cuadros challenges the notion of a supposed scientific consensus among his colleagues and highlights the curious nature of man-made global warming, where every fact seems to confirm it, regardless of whether temperatures are rising or decreasing. This quote prompts a deeper examination of the scientific community's views on global warming, the influence of climate models, and the challenges of reaching a consensus on such a complex and far-reaching issue.

The first part of the quote, "I do not find the supposed scientific consensus among my colleagues," suggests that there may be a lack of agreement or unity within the scientific community regarding the concept of man-made global warming. This challenges the commonly held belief that there is overwhelming consensus among scientists about the reality and causes of global warming. It implies that there may be differing perspectives, interpretations of data, and hypotheses among scientists studying climate change.

Cuadros then points out the curious nature of man-made global warming, stating that "every fact confirms it: rising temperatures or decreasing temperatures." This observation raises the question of how a theory can seemingly accommodate contradictory evidence. It suggests that regardless of the actual weather patterns or temperature trends observed, there is always a climate model or explanation that supports the concept of man-made global warming. This notion of "watertight explanation" implies that the framework of man-made global warming may be structured in a way that makes it resistant to being disproven by empirical data.

The quote can be interpreted as a critique of the scientific process and the influence of models in shaping our understanding of global warming. It highlights the challenge of navigating through a complex web of scientific information, models, and interpretations to arrive at a clear understanding of the factors driving climate change. It also raises questions about the potential for bias or preconceived notions to influence the interpretation of data and the development of climate models.

In the context of ongoing debates and discussions about climate change, the quote by Cuadros serves as a reminder of the complexities and nuances involved in understanding and addressing global warming. It underscores the need for critical thinking, robust scientific inquiry, and open dialogue within the scientific community to advance our understanding of climate change.

Furthermore, the quote may also prompt reflection on the broader societal and political implications of global warming. The differing viewpoints within the scientific community can have significant ramifications for policy decisions, public perception, and international cooperation on climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. Understanding the diversity of perspectives and interpretations within the scientific community is crucial for fostering constructive dialogue and informed decision-making on climate-related issues.

In conclusion, Javier Cuadros' quote provides a thought-provoking insight into the challenges and complexities surrounding the concept of man-made global warming. It invites us to critically examine the scientific consensus, the role of climate models, and the interpretation of empirical data in shaping our understanding of climate change. By considering the diverse perspectives and ongoing debates within the scientific community, we can better appreciate the multifaceted nature of global warming and the importance of rigorous scientific inquiry in addressing this critical issue.