Meaning: The quote, "Reputation is favorable notoriety as distinguished from fame, which is permanent approval of great deeds and noble thoughts by the best intelligence of mankind," by George Curtis, sheds light on the nuanced differences between reputation and fame. George William Curtis was an American writer, public speaker, and editor in the 19th century, known for his insightful commentary on social issues and human nature.

In this quote, Curtis juxtaposes reputation and fame, highlighting their distinctions. He characterizes reputation as "favorable notoriety," suggesting that it is the general perception or estimation of a person or entity by others. This implies that reputation is shaped by the collective opinions and experiences of those who have come into contact with the individual or organization in question. Furthermore, the term "favorable notoriety" implies that reputation can be influenced by both positive and negative traits or actions, as notoriety can carry both connotations. It is worth noting that reputation is often based on perception rather than objective reality, as it is subject to the interpretations and biases of others.

On the other hand, Curtis defines fame as "permanent approval of great deeds and noble thoughts by the best intelligence of mankind." Unlike reputation, which is more fluid and subject to change, fame is characterized by its enduring nature. It is not merely based on public opinion or perception but is rooted in the recognition and commendation of significant accomplishments and virtuous ideas. Curtis suggests that fame is bestowed by the "best intelligence of mankind," implying that it is the discerning and enlightened individuals who confer this lasting approval. This distinction elevates fame to a higher standard, emphasizing the importance of genuine achievement and moral excellence in attaining lasting renown.

Curtis' insight into the differences between reputation and fame invites contemplation on the nature of recognition and acclaim. While reputation may be more readily influenced by external factors and subjective opinions, fame is depicted as a more substantial and enduring form of recognition. This differentiation prompts consideration of the values and qualities that underpin each concept. Reputation may be shaped by various factors such as public relations, social influence, and personal interactions, whereas fame seems to be tied to the impact of one's actions and the enduring significance of their contributions to society.

Moreover, the quote alludes to the idea that while reputation may be more malleable and susceptible to fluctuations, fame is associated with a more profound and lasting impact. It suggests that fame is not merely about being well-known or popular, but about leaving a meaningful and positive imprint on the world through "great deeds and noble thoughts." Curtis' distinction between reputation and fame encourages reflection on the true markers of significance and the enduring legacy that individuals and institutions aspire to leave behind.

In conclusion, George William Curtis' quote offers a thought-provoking exploration of the disparities between reputation and fame. By contrasting these two concepts, Curtis prompts contemplation on the nature of recognition, the values that underpin it, and the enduring impact of one's actions and contributions. His insights invite us to consider the distinctions between transient perception and lasting acclaim, as well as the qualities that distinguish mere notoriety from genuine renown.