Meaning: The quote "The love of their country is with them only a mode of flattering its master; as soon as they think that master can no longer hear, they speak of everything with a frankness which is the more startling because those who listen to it become responsible" is attributed to Marquis de Custine, a French aristocrat, writer, and traveler who lived in the 19th century. This quote reflects Custine's observations on the nature of patriotism and loyalty in certain societies, particularly those characterized by authoritarian rule.

Custine is known for his travelogue "Empire of the Czar: A Journey Through Eternal Russia," in which he documented his experiences and observations during a trip to Russia in the 1830s. His writings offer keen insights into the social, political, and cultural dynamics of the countries he visited, and his observations often shed light on broader themes such as power, authority, and national identity.

In the quoted passage, Custine appears to be highlighting a paradoxical aspect of patriotism in societies where authoritarianism or despotism prevails. He suggests that the professed love of country by the inhabitants is not rooted in genuine sentiment, but rather serves as a means of ingratiating themselves with the ruling authority. This superficial display of patriotism, according to Custine, is a mode of flattery aimed at pleasing the ruler or "master" of the country.

Moreover, Custine implies that this outward show of loyalty is contingent on the perceived presence of the ruling authority. When individuals believe that the "master" can no longer hear or exercise control, they abandon their pretense of patriotism and speak with unguarded candor. This shift in behavior, from sycophantic flattery to unfiltered outspokenness, is described by Custine as "startling" due to the sudden emergence of frankness and honesty in the absence of perceived authority.

The quote also alludes to the idea that those who listen to the unguarded remarks made in the absence of the ruling authority bear a sense of responsibility. This responsibility may stem from the awareness that the unfiltered opinions expressed in such moments could carry significant consequences or implications, especially in societies where dissent or criticism of the ruling power is met with harsh reprisals.

Custine's observations in this quote resonate with broader discussions about the nature of patriotism, authority, and political dissent. He captures the complex dynamics at play in societies where outward displays of loyalty to the state may be driven by self-preservation or the desire to curry favor with those in power. Additionally, Custine's commentary raises questions about the authenticity of patriotism in contexts where fear or coercion may underpin public displays of allegiance to the ruling regime.

In conclusion, Marquis de Custine's quote offers a thought-provoking perspective on the complexities of patriotism and loyalty in the context of authoritarian rule. His observations invite reflection on the interplay between outward displays of national pride, the dynamics of power and authority, and the nuanced expressions of dissent in societies where freedom of expression may be constrained. It serves as a compelling insight into the intricacies of political allegiances and the impact of authoritarianism on the genuineness of patriotic sentiments.