Meaning: The quote "If he is a ghost, then it's very disappointing for me, because he is banished in the story, and that could mean that he won't be coming back, and that would be terrible, wouldn't it?" by Paul Darrow, an actor, reflects the sentiment of disappointment and concern about the potential absence of a character in a story. This quote captures the emotional attachment that audiences and creators develop towards characters in narratives, and the impact their absence can have on the overall storytelling experience.

The use of the term "ghost" in this quote suggests that the character in question may have been removed from the story or met an unfortunate fate, leaving a lingering presence or memory. This concept of a character being a "ghost" can evoke feelings of loss and finality, as if the character's role in the story has been abruptly ended. Paul Darrow's expression of disappointment conveys the profound impact that the absence of a beloved character can have on both the narrative and the audience's engagement with it.

The idea of a character being "banished in the story" further emphasizes the sense of exclusion and separation. This notion of banishment implies a deliberate decision to remove the character, possibly indicating a significant plot development or conflict that led to their departure. The use of the word "banished" also carries connotations of isolation and rejection, highlighting the emotional weight of the character's absence.

The concern expressed about the character not coming back speaks to the uncertainty and apprehension surrounding the character's future within the story. This apprehension is rooted in the fear of losing a character who has likely played a meaningful role in the narrative, and whose presence has contributed to the audience's investment in the story.

Paul Darrow's use of the phrase "that would be terrible, wouldn't it?" invites the audience to empathize with his perspective and share in his dismay over the potential loss of the character. This rhetorical question underscores the emotional impact of losing a character and prompts reflection on the significance of their continued presence within the story.

Overall, this quote encapsulates the attachment and emotional investment that audiences and creators develop towards characters in stories. It highlights the profound impact of character dynamics on the storytelling experience and the sense of loss and disappointment that can arise when a character's role is jeopardized or terminated. Additionally, it underscores the importance of character continuity and the lasting impression that characters can leave on the narrative and its audience.

In conclusion, Paul Darrow's quote poignantly captures the emotional significance of characters within storytelling and the potential distress caused by the removal or uncertain fate of a beloved character. It serves as a reminder of the deep connections and attachments that audiences form with characters, and the profound impact of their presence or absence within the narrative.