Meaning: This quote by Peter Davies, a composer, highlights a common sentiment among artists and educators regarding the perceived lack of support for the arts and education in certain societal and institutional structures, particularly in Britain. The quote reflects a belief that the establishment prioritizes profit over the value of art and education, leading to a devaluation of these important aspects of society.

In the context of this quote, "the establishment" refers to the prevailing social, economic, and political systems that influence and shape the values and priorities of a society. Davies suggests that this establishment, as it pertains to Britain, is inherently opposed to the arts and education. This opposition is attributed to the establishment's emphasis on profitability as the primary measure of value and validity.

The assertion that "If something doesn't make a profit, it's invalid" encapsulates the perceived mindset of the establishment, which prioritizes financial gain and commercial success as the ultimate indicators of worth. This perspective, according to Davies, leads to the marginalization of art and education, as they are not typically driven by profit in the same way as commercial enterprises.

Furthermore, Davies contends that art doesn't make a profit in the sense valued by the establishment. This statement reflects a broader critique of the commodification of art and the limitations of defining its worth solely in economic terms. By emphasizing the lack of profitability in the traditional sense, Davies challenges the prevailing notion that financial success is the sole measure of value, particularly within the realm of artistic expression and cultural enrichment.

The sentiment expressed in this quote resonates with ongoing debates and concerns about the underfunding and undervaluing of arts and education in many societies. Advocates for the arts and education often highlight the intrinsic value of these pursuits, emphasizing their role in fostering creativity, critical thinking, cultural understanding, and overall human development. However, the prioritization of profit-driven metrics in the allocation of resources and support can lead to neglect and underappreciation of these essential components of society.

In the specific context of Britain, this quote reflects the experiences and frustrations of artists, educators, and cultural institutions contending with funding cuts, policy decisions, and societal attitudes that appear to prioritize economic gain over the broader benefits of a thriving arts and education sector. It speaks to a perceived disconnect between the values and priorities of the establishment and the needs of the artistic and educational communities.

It is important to note that the perspectives articulated in this quote are not universally held, and there are diverse opinions and ongoing efforts to advocate for greater recognition and support for the arts and education. Many individuals, organizations, and policymakers continue to champion the intrinsic value of the arts and education, seeking to address disparities in funding, access, and appreciation.

In conclusion, Peter Davies' quote serves as a poignant commentary on the perceived challenges and neglect faced by the arts and education within the prevailing establishment in Britain. It underscores the broader tension between commercial imperatives and the intrinsic value of cultural enrichment and intellectual development. The quote invites reflection on the societal priorities and the ways in which the arts and education are valued and supported within different contexts.