Meaning: This quote by Robertson Davies, a renowned Canadian novelist, delves into the concept of conservatism and the idea that some individuals may adopt conservative beliefs without fully understanding the origins or reasons behind those beliefs. It suggests that for some people, conservatism is not a result of deep personal conviction or a thorough understanding of the principles being upheld; rather, it is a reflexive and borrowed stance.

Davies' quote raises thought-provoking questions about the nature of conservatism and the motivations behind it. It challenges the notion that conservatism is always a product of careful consideration and a deep understanding of traditions and values. Instead, it implies that there are individuals who identify as conservative without a clear comprehension of the underlying principles they are purportedly conserving.

Conservatism, as a political and social ideology, is often associated with the preservation of traditional values, institutions, and practices. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining established societal structures and beliefs, often resisting rapid change or innovation. While conservatism can be a genuine and deeply held conviction for many, Davies' quote suggests that there are also those who adhere to conservative positions without a true understanding of the historical, cultural, or philosophical underpinnings of those positions.

The notion of "secondhand conservatism" proposed in the quote implies a lack of genuine engagement with the principles being upheld. It suggests that some individuals adopt conservative views simply because they have been passed down to them, either through family, community, or cultural influences, without critically examining or fully grasping the significance of those beliefs.

In a broader sense, Davies' quote can be interpreted as a critique of uncritical adherence to any ideology or belief system. It highlights the importance of genuine understanding and personal reflection in shaping one's worldview, regardless of political orientation. It encourages individuals to question the origins and implications of their beliefs, rather than simply adopting them as a matter of tradition or habit.

This quote also raises the question of whether genuine conservatism necessitates a deep understanding of the traditions and values it seeks to uphold. Can one be a true conservative without a comprehensive knowledge of the historical and philosophical foundations of conservatism? Davies seems to suggest that without this understanding, one's conservatism may be lacking in authenticity and depth.

In conclusion, Robertson Davies' quote challenges us to consider the nature of conservatism and the motivations behind it. It prompts us to reflect on the authenticity of our beliefs and the importance of understanding the principles we claim to uphold. Whether one identifies as conservative, liberal, or holds any other ideological position, Davies' words encourage us to engage critically with our beliefs and to seek a deeper understanding of the traditions and values we aim to conserve.