Meaning: This quote by Robertson Davies, a Canadian novelist, reflects a critical view of literary critics and their expectations of authors. Davies suggests that literary critics often assume that every author aspires to push the boundaries of literary art and delve into new dimensions of the human spirit. However, he challenges this assumption by implying that not every author necessarily harbors such ambitions. Furthermore, Davies implies that it is unreasonable to expect every author to have such aspirations, and that those who do not should not be made to feel ashamed.

In this quote, Davies seems to be addressing the tendency of literary critics to impose their own expectations and standards on authors, disregarding the diverse motivations and goals that different writers may have. He emphasizes the individuality of authors and suggests that not all of them may share the same creative ambitions. This challenges the common perception that all writers are driven by a desire to innovate and push the boundaries of literature.

Davies' perspective sheds light on the complex relationship between authors and literary critics. While critics often play a crucial role in analyzing and evaluating literary works, Davies' quote highlights the potential pitfalls of assuming uniformity in authors' creative intentions. By expressing his skepticism about the notion that every author is inherently driven to expand the horizons of literary art, Davies prompts a reconsideration of the assumptions and expectations that critics may hold.

Moreover, Davies' quote raises important questions about the nature of creativity and the diversity of artistic motivations. It invites reflection on the multiplicity of reasons why authors write and the various forms of expression they may pursue. By challenging the idea that authors should feel obligated to constantly push the boundaries of literary art, Davies encourages a more nuanced and individualized understanding of the creative process.

Furthermore, the quote also touches upon the issue of artistic freedom and the right of authors to pursue their creative endeavors according to their own inclinations. By suggesting that authors should not be made to feel ashamed if they do not share the same aspirations as those imposed by literary critics, Davies advocates for a more inclusive and accepting approach to the diversity of literary expression.

In conclusion, Robertson Davies' quote offers a thought-provoking critique of the assumptions and expectations placed on authors by literary critics. It highlights the importance of recognizing the individuality of writers and their diverse creative motivations. By challenging the notion that all authors are inherently driven to push the boundaries of literary art, Davies prompts a reconsideration of the relationship between authors and critics, as well as a more inclusive understanding of the diverse paths of literary creation.