Meaning: The quote "Do not suppose, however, that I intend to urge a diet of classics on anybody. I have seen such diets at work. I have known people who have actually read all, or almost all, the guaranteed Hundred Best Books. God save us from reading nothing but the best." by Robertson Davies, a Canadian novelist, playwright, critic, journalist, and professor, reflects a thought-provoking perspective on the consumption of literature and the potential pitfalls of exclusively focusing on classic or acclaimed works.

Davies' quote challenges the notion that one should exclusively adhere to a "diet of classics" or limit their reading to only the most esteemed literary works. He expresses skepticism about the idea of prescribing a rigid literary diet, suggesting that he has observed the potential drawbacks of such an approach. By invoking the concept of "the guaranteed Hundred Best Books," Davies highlights the notion of a prescribed reading list that is often put forth as the pinnacle of literary achievement. However, his plea for divine intervention - "God save us from reading nothing but the best" - hints at a concern that an exclusive focus on acclaimed works may limit readers' exposure to a diverse range of perspectives and styles.

Davies' perspective can be interpreted as a call for balance and diversity in reading habits. While he does not dismiss the value of classics and acclaimed literature, he warns against the potential consequences of fixating solely on these works. By using the term "diet," Davies draws a parallel between reading habits and nutritional intake, suggesting that an over-reliance on a narrow range of literary works may lead to intellectual stagnation or monotony.

In contemporary literary discourse, Davies' quote resonates with ongoing discussions about the canon, diversity in reading, and the value of exploring a broad spectrum of voices and genres. The idea of a "diet of classics" has been scrutinized for its potential to perpetuate exclusivity and marginalize diverse voices, particularly those of women, people of color, and marginalized communities whose works may not have historically been included in the canon of "best" literature.

Additionally, Davies' caution against "reading nothing but the best" raises questions about the subjective nature of literary merit and the ever-evolving landscape of literary excellence. What constitutes the "best" in literature is a complex and subjective matter, influenced by factors such as cultural context, historical relevance, and personal taste. Davies' quote encourages readers to approach literature with an open mind and a willingness to explore beyond the confines of traditionally celebrated works.

Furthermore, Davies' perspective invites reflection on the purpose of reading and the multifaceted benefits of engaging with a wide range of literary works. While classics and acclaimed books undoubtedly offer valuable insights and enduring relevance, there is also immense value in embracing lesser-known or contemporary voices, experimental forms, and genre-bending narratives. By advocating for a more inclusive and varied literary diet, Davies advocates for a richer and more expansive reading experience that encompasses a multitude of voices and perspectives.

In conclusion, Robertson Davies' quote serves as a thought-provoking reminder of the potential limitations of fixating solely on classics and acclaimed literature. His plea for diversity and balance in reading habits encourages readers to approach literature with an open mind, embracing a wide range of voices and genres. By cautioning against the exclusive pursuit of "the best," Davies invites readers to cultivate a literary diet that is rich, diverse, and reflective of the multifaceted nature of human experience.