Meaning: The quote in question is a commentary on a specific incident involving former U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, and it delves into broader societal and political implications. To provide some context, the incident being referred to occurred during a 2009 Senate hearing on climate change. At the hearing, Brigadier General Michael Walsh referred to Boxer as "ma'am" while responding to her questions. Boxer, seemingly taking offense at being called "ma'am," interrupted the general and requested that he call her "Senator" instead.

The quote, by Mark Davis, a writer, seems to express disapproval of Boxer's reaction and uses it as a springboard to criticize what the author perceives as sanctimonious self-absorption on the modern left. The author contrasts Boxer's reaction to how other female senators, such as Kay Bailey Hutchinson and Claire McCaskill, might have responded to being called "ma'am."

The quote touches on several themes, including gender dynamics, political attitudes, and societal expectations. It underscores the idea of entitlement and self-absorption, particularly within the context of political discourse and interactions. The mention of the "modern left" suggests a broader critique of certain attitudes and behaviors associated with left-leaning political ideologies.

The use of the term "sanctimonious self-absorption" implies a sense of moral superiority and self-centeredness, suggesting that the author sees Boxer's reaction as emblematic of these traits. The phrase "makes my teeth itch" emphasizes the author's strong aversion to what they perceive as a particular attitude or behavior.

The mention of other female senators, Kay Bailey Hutchinson and Claire McCaskill, serves to contrast Boxer's reaction with a hypothetical alternative. The author seems to suggest that these other senators might have responded differently, perhaps implying that Boxer's reaction was unwarranted or excessive.

The quote can be interpreted as a commentary on gender dynamics and expectations, particularly within the context of politics. The use of Boxer's reaction as a focal point allows the author to critique what they see as an example of self-absorption and entitlement within a specific political context.

From a broader perspective, the quote may also be seen as part of ongoing discussions about gender, power, and behavior in professional settings. The incident involving Boxer raises questions about how individuals in positions of authority should be addressed and how gender may influence those interactions.

In summary, the quote by Mark Davis provides commentary on an incident involving former Senator Barbara Boxer and uses it to critique what the author perceives as sanctimonious self-absorption on the modern left. It touches on themes of gender, politics, and societal attitudes, offering a perspective that invites further reflection and discussion.