Meaning: This quote by Christopher Dawson delves into the philosophical concept of the human being as a means rather than an end. It presents the idea that individuals are often used as tools or instruments to achieve certain economic or political goals, without being considered as ends in themselves. The quote also suggests that these economic and political ends are not ultimate goals, but rather serve as means to achieve other ends, leading to an infinite chain of means and ends.

In this quote, Dawson highlights the instrumental nature of human beings in the context of economic and political pursuits. From an economic perspective, individuals are often utilized as labor, consumers, or resources to drive production and consumption. They are considered as a means to generate wealth, enhance productivity, or achieve economic growth. Similarly, in the realm of politics, people are often manipulated or mobilized to support specific agendas, ideologies, or power structures. In this sense, individuals are seen as a means to advance political interests, maintain authority, or pursue governance objectives.

Dawson's assertion that these economic and political ends are not truly ends in themselves but rather serve as means to other ends reflects a critical perspective on the nature of human agency and purpose. It implies that the pursuit of economic prosperity or political power does not represent the ultimate fulfillment or purpose of human existence. Instead, these pursuits are portrayed as intermediary objectives that lead to further means and ends, creating a perpetual cycle of instrumentalization and goal-seeking.

Furthermore, the phrase "and so ad infinitum" at the end of the quote emphasizes the endless and recursive nature of this instrumentalization. It suggests that the utilization of individuals as means, and the pursuit of economic and political ends as means to other ends, perpetuates an infinite chain of instrumental relationships and goal-oriented endeavors. This concept raises questions about the intrinsic value and dignity of human beings, as well as the ultimate significance of the pursuits that drive societal and institutional activities.

Dawson's quote invites contemplation on the ethical and existential implications of treating individuals primarily as means to external ends. It prompts consideration of the balance between instrumental utilization and the recognition of human autonomy, dignity, and intrinsic worth. Moreover, it encourages reflection on the nature of societal structures, power dynamics, and the overarching purpose of human endeavors beyond immediate economic or political objectives.

In summary, Christopher Dawson's quote offers a thought-provoking perspective on the instrumental nature of human beings within economic and political contexts. It challenges us to examine the pervasive use of individuals as means to ends, and to contemplate the broader implications of this instrumentalization on human agency, value, and the ultimate purpose of societal pursuits.