Meaning: The quote by John Anderson addresses the importance of sound science and high-quality consultation in decision-making processes. It reflects the idea that for any decision to be credible and trustworthy, it must be supported by robust scientific evidence and involve a thorough and transparent consultation with relevant stakeholders. The quote also highlights the significance of maintaining public confidence in the process, which can only be achieved through a commitment to rigor and quality.

When examining this quote, it's essential to understand the context in which it was made. John Anderson is known for his involvement in public policy and governance, particularly in areas related to science and technology. As such, his statement likely pertains to a specific decision-making scenario where scientific input and public consultation are integral.

The first part of the quote, "I'm not being evasive but I am saying I'm not a scientist and I'm not directly involved in the consultation," sets the stage for Anderson's perspective. He acknowledges his role as an outsider to the scientific and consultative processes under consideration, emphasizing that his comments are not an attempt to evade responsibility but rather to provide a candid assessment from his vantage point.

Anderson's assertion that "the science must be sound, it must be agreed" underscores the foundational role of scientific evidence in informing decision-making. This aligns with the broader principle that evidence-based policymaking is crucial for addressing complex societal challenges. The phrase "it must be agreed" also hints at the need for consensus within the scientific community, suggesting that decisions should be supported by a consensus among experts to ensure their credibility and legitimacy.

Furthermore, the quote emphasizes the importance of high-quality consultation, stating that "the consultation must be of a high quality or no one will have any confidence in the process." This reflects a recognition of the value of engaging diverse stakeholders and the public in decision-making processes. Quality consultation involves transparency, inclusivity, and meaningful engagement, all of which contribute to building trust and legitimacy in the decisions that emerge from the process.

In essence, Anderson's quote encapsulates the idea that decision-making at the intersection of science and policy requires a robust foundation of sound science and high-quality consultation. It underscores the need for a process that is not only rooted in credible scientific evidence but also inclusive of diverse perspectives and responsive to public concerns.

In conclusion, John Anderson's quote serves as a reminder of the critical role that sound science and high-quality consultation play in shaping effective and credible decision-making processes. It underscores the imperative of upholding rigorous scientific standards while also fostering transparency and engagement with stakeholders. By adhering to these principles, decision-makers can enhance the legitimacy and acceptance of their decisions, ultimately contributing to more effective and sustainable outcomes for society.