Meaning: The quote you provided refers to the concept of birthright citizenship, which is the automatic granting of citizenship to anyone born within a country's borders, regardless of the nationality or immigration status of their parents. The quote suggests that the majority of westernized countries, including European nations, Israel, and Japan, do not adhere to the practice of birthright citizenship.

Birthright citizenship has been a topic of significant debate and controversy, particularly in the United States, where it is enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The amendment, ratified in 1868, states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." This provision has been interpreted to grant citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents' immigration status.

In contrast, many other countries do not follow the principle of birthright citizenship. In European countries, citizenship is often based on jus sanguinis, meaning it is determined by the nationality or citizenship of one's parents, rather than the location of birth. Israel and Japan also have more restrictive citizenship laws, typically requiring at least one parent to be a citizen in order for a child to acquire citizenship.

The rationale behind the differing approaches to birthright citizenship lies in each country's historical, cultural, and demographic context. In the case of the United States, the principle of birthright citizenship has been seen as a reflection of the nation's identity as a melting pot of immigrants, providing a pathway to citizenship for those born on American soil, regardless of their parents' background.

On the other hand, the European approach, rooted in the concept of jus sanguinis, reflects a more traditional understanding of national identity, where citizenship is tied to ancestral roots and familial connections to the country. This approach is often seen as a way to preserve cultural and national identity within the context of diverse and multicultural societies.

In the case of Israel, the unique historical and geopolitical context of the country has influenced its citizenship laws, which are designed to maintain a Jewish majority and protect the state's identity as a homeland for the Jewish people. Japan, with its relatively homogenous population, has historically maintained strict controls over immigration and citizenship, reflecting a desire to preserve its cultural and national identity.

The debate over birthright citizenship is complex and multifaceted, encompassing considerations of immigration policy, national identity, and the rights of individuals born within a country's borders. Proponents of birthright citizenship argue that it is a fundamental aspect of inclusivity and equality, providing a pathway to full participation in society for those born in a country. Critics, however, raise concerns about potential abuse of the system, such as "birth tourism," where individuals travel to a country for the purpose of giving birth to gain citizenship for their child.

In conclusion, the quote highlights the diverse approaches to citizenship and the complex considerations that underpin the debate over birthright citizenship. Understanding the historical, cultural, and demographic factors that shape each country's approach is essential for engaging in informed discussions about this contentious issue.