Meaning: This quote by Edsger Dijkstra, a renowned computer scientist, delves into the concept of elegance and its lack of popularity. Dijkstra suggests that elegance requires both hard work to achieve and a good education to appreciate, which may be the reason why it has found little following. In this context, elegance refers to a quality of simplicity, efficiency, and beauty in design, problem-solving, or any intellectual pursuit.

Elegance in the context of computer science and programming often refers to the simplicity and effectiveness of a solution or algorithm. An elegant solution is one that achieves the desired outcome using the most straightforward, efficient, and clear approach. In this sense, elegance is highly valued in the world of programming, as it leads to code that is easier to understand, maintain, and extend.

Dijkstra's assertion that elegance has found little following may stem from the fact that achieving elegance in any field often requires a deep understanding of the subject matter and a willingness to put in the effort to simplify and refine one's work. This aligns with his observation that hard work is needed to achieve elegance. It suggests that many may opt for quicker, less refined solutions rather than investing the time and effort required to produce something elegant.

Moreover, Dijkstra's assertion that a good education is needed to appreciate elegance speaks to the idea that recognizing and valuing elegance often requires a certain level of knowledge and experience within a given domain. In the context of computer science, this might mean having a strong understanding of algorithms, data structures, and software design principles to fully appreciate the elegance of a particular solution.

It's worth noting that the concept of elegance extends beyond the realm of programming and computer science. In mathematics, for example, elegant proofs and solutions are highly esteemed for their simplicity and clarity. Similarly, in design and engineering, elegance often refers to the ability to achieve maximum functionality with minimal complexity.

In art and aesthetics, elegance is associated with a sense of refinement, sophistication, and harmony. Whether in architecture, fashion, or visual arts, elegance conveys a sense of beauty and grace achieved through simplicity and restraint.

The quote also raises the question of why elegance is not more widely appreciated or pursued. One possible explanation is that the pursuit of elegance often requires a significant investment of time and resources, which may not always align with practical constraints or immediate goals. In a fast-paced, results-driven world, the emphasis may lean more toward quick and functional solutions rather than the refinement and elegance of design.

Furthermore, the subjective nature of elegance may contribute to its limited following. What one person considers elegant, another may not. This subjectivity can make it challenging to achieve consensus on what constitutes elegance in any given context.

In conclusion, Dijkstra's quote offers thought-provoking insights into the nature of elegance and its reception in various fields. It highlights the challenges and prerequisites for achieving and appreciating elegance, shedding light on the complexities of valuing and pursuing elegance in a world that often favors expediency over refinement. Despite its limited following, the pursuit of elegance continues to inspire and challenge those who seek to create and appreciate the beauty of simplicity and efficiency in their work.