Meaning: The quote by Edsger Dijkstra, a renowned computer scientist, addresses the tendency of mathematicians to idealize their cultural ancestors and the long tradition of rational thinking. Dijkstra suggests that many mathematicians derive part of their self-esteem from feeling themselves as the proud heirs of this tradition, but he expresses concern about the idealization of their cultural ancestors. This quote touches upon the complex relationship between modern thinkers and the historical roots of their discipline, as well as the potential pitfalls of idealizing the past.

Dijkstra's assertion that mathematicians derive part of their self-esteem from feeling themselves as the proud heirs of a long tradition of rational thinking reflects the deep respect and reverence that many individuals in the field of mathematics hold for the historical development of their discipline. Mathematicians often view themselves as part of a lineage of thinkers who have contributed to the advancement of knowledge and rational thought. This sense of belonging to a prestigious tradition can contribute to the self-esteem of mathematicians, as they see themselves as continuing the work of their intellectual predecessors.

However, Dijkstra's caution about idealizing cultural ancestors raises important questions about the potential drawbacks of this mindset. Idealization of historical figures and traditions can lead to a romanticized view of the past, obscuring the complexities, limitations, and even errors of those who came before. By placing their cultural ancestors on a pedestal, mathematicians may overlook the flaws and challenges that these predecessors faced, thus creating an unrealistic and idealized image of the past.

Moreover, the idealization of cultural ancestors can also hinder the critical examination of historical mathematical concepts and theories. When mathematicians idealize their predecessors, they may be less inclined to question or challenge the established ideas, potentially impeding the progress of the discipline. Dijkstra's concern highlights the importance of maintaining a critical and reflective approach to the historical roots of mathematics, acknowledging both the achievements and the limitations of past thinkers.

Dijkstra's perspective also prompts reflection on the broader implications of idealizing cultural ancestors in the context of intellectual and scientific disciplines. The tendency to idealize the past is not unique to mathematics; it can be observed in various fields where practitioners seek validation and inspiration from the achievements of historical figures. While it is natural to draw inspiration from the past, it is essential to maintain a balanced and critical perspective that recognizes the historical context and the evolving nature of knowledge.

In conclusion, Dijkstra's quote sheds light on the complex interplay between the self-esteem of mathematicians, their cultural heritage, and the potential idealization of historical figures. While acknowledging the significance of the long tradition of rational thinking, Dijkstra urges caution against overly idealizing cultural ancestors. His perspective serves as a reminder of the importance of critically engaging with the historical roots of mathematics, fostering a balanced and nuanced understanding of the discipline's evolution. Ultimately, the quote invites mathematicians and scholars in other fields to approach their cultural heritage with a critical eye, recognizing the achievements of the past while also acknowledging its limitations and complexities.