Meaning: Annie Dillard is an American author known for her contemplative and thought-provoking writing. The quote in question is a dialogue between an Eskimo and a priest, which touches upon the concepts of God, sin, and the implications of knowledge on one's spiritual destiny. The quote is often interpreted as a commentary on the consequences of religious teachings and the complexities of faith and morality.

The Eskimo's question reflects a profound existential and moral dilemma. It raises the issue of whether ignorance of religious concepts such as God and sin should absolve an individual from the consequences of not adhering to them. The priest's response, "No, not if you did not know," implies that ignorance of these concepts would exempt the Eskimo from the traditional Christian notion of hell.

The Eskimo's subsequent question, "Then why did you tell me?" is a poignant expression of confusion and perhaps even resentment. It suggests that the priest's act of imparting this knowledge has burdened the Eskimo with a previously non-existent fear or concern about hell. The entire exchange encapsulates the complexities of religious teachings and their potential impact on individuals who were previously unaware of such concepts.

This quote could be interpreted in various ways. One interpretation is that it raises questions about the responsibility of religious authorities in imparting knowledge about concepts that carry significant moral and existential weight. It also highlights the potential consequences of this knowledge on individuals who may have lived in blissful ignorance prior to being exposed to these ideas. Additionally, the quote prompts reflection on the nature of sin, punishment, and the role of awareness in determining an individual's spiritual fate.

Annie Dillard's use of this dialogue in her writing may serve to provoke readers into contemplating the implications of religious teachings and the moral dilemmas they present. It encourages critical examination of the ethical dimensions of religious instruction and its impact on individuals who may have previously been free from the burden of such knowledge.

Overall, the quote captures a profound and thought-provoking exchange between two individuals grappling with the implications of religious teachings. It raises important questions about the relationship between knowledge, morality, and spiritual consequences. Annie Dillard's incorporation of this dialogue in her work aligns with her reputation for engaging readers in deep philosophical and existential contemplation.