Meaning: This quote by Mary Douglas, a renowned British anthropologist, sheds light on the similarities between religious bodies and information networks. In her comparison, Douglas highlights the existence of divisions and structures within both systems, and the tendency for blame-shifting to occur. She draws parallels between the sects and hierarchies found in religious organizations and the bazaars and cathedrals within information networks, suggesting that despite their different natures, they share underlying patterns of behavior and organization.

To delve deeper into the quote, it's essential to understand the context in which Mary Douglas made this comparison. Douglas was known for her work in cultural anthropology, particularly her studies on symbolism and ritual. She was interested in the ways that societies create and maintain social order, and her insights often focused on the symbolic and structural aspects of human cultures.

The comparison between religious bodies and information networks is a thought-provoking one. By referring to sects and hierarchies within religious bodies, Douglas alludes to the existence of factions and power structures within organized religions. These divisions can lead to internal conflicts and power struggles, as different groups vie for influence and control within the larger religious framework.

On the other hand, when Douglas mentions bazaars and cathedrals within information networks, she is likely highlighting the diverse and decentralized nature of information exchange. The "bazaars" represent the bustling and diverse marketplace of ideas and information, where a wide array of voices and perspectives can be found. In contrast, the "cathedrals" symbolize the more centralized and authoritative sources of information, such as established institutions or experts whose expertise is widely recognized.

In both religious bodies and information networks, the dynamics of blame-shifting and finger-pointing come into play. Within religious organizations, different sects may blame each other for doctrinal differences or perceived deviations from the "true" faith. Similarly, in information networks, different groups or sources may engage in finger-pointing and blame-shifting when it comes to the spread of misinformation, the validation of certain narratives, or the propagation of biased viewpoints.

The notion of survival is also pertinent in Douglas's comparison. Both religious bodies and information networks must navigate internal and external challenges to their existence and influence. The survival of sects within religious bodies and the survival of diverse sources of information within networks are contingent on their ability to adapt, compete, and maintain their relevance in the face of internal and external pressures.

In conclusion, Mary Douglas's quote offers a thought-provoking comparison between religious bodies and information networks, inviting us to consider the parallels in their organizational dynamics and the challenges they face. By highlighting the presence of divisions, blame-shifting, and the imperative of survival, Douglas prompts us to examine the underlying patterns that shape human interactions and institutions, regardless of their specific nature or purpose.