Meaning: The quote by Mary Douglas, a prominent British anthropologist, captures the tendency of traditional or "old-timer" communities to create a moral boundary between themselves and the external world. Douglas is known for her work in cultural anthropology and sociology, particularly for her influential book "Purity and Danger," where she explores the concepts of purity and pollution in different cultures. In this quote, she highlights the inclination of established communities to delineate a clear distinction between those within their moral framework, considered as "saints," and those outside, deemed as "sinners."

The notion of building a "strong moral wall against the outside" reflects the human tendency to establish boundaries, both physically and metaphorically, to protect the values and norms of a particular group or society. This phenomenon is not limited to religious or traditional communities but can also be observed in various social, cultural, and political contexts. The concept of "us versus them" is a fundamental aspect of human social behavior, and it often manifests in the form of moral or ideological segregation.

Douglas' reference to the world being "painted in black and white" underscores the dichotomous nature of such moral boundaries. By categorizing individuals or groups as either "saints" or "sinners," there is a simplification of the complexity of human behavior and identity. This binary outlook can lead to the stigmatization and exclusion of those perceived as "outsiders," reinforcing a sense of moral superiority among the "insiders."

The quote also alludes to the inherent tension between conformity and deviance within social structures. While the old-timers aim to maintain a sense of moral purity and cohesion within their community, this inward focus can lead to a rigid and sometimes intolerant worldview. The construction of a moral wall may serve as a defense mechanism against perceived threats to the established order, but it can also contribute to the marginalization of individuals or groups who do not fit within the predetermined moral framework.

In the broader context of cultural anthropology, Douglas' insights shed light on the dynamics of social boundaries and the construction of symbolic systems of meaning. The concept of purity and pollution, central to her work, elucidates how societies establish and maintain order through the classification of people, objects, and behaviors. The moral wall described in the quote represents a symbolic demarcation that not only separates the "inside" from the "outside" but also regulates interactions and influences the social dynamics within a community.

Moreover, the quote invites contemplation on the universality of this phenomenon across different cultural and historical settings. The inclination to create moral distinctions and fortify boundaries is a recurrent theme in the study of human societies, reflecting the innate human desire for order, security, and belonging. However, this propensity also raises questions about the implications of such moral walls, particularly in terms of inclusivity, diversity, and the potential for social change and adaptation.

In conclusion, Mary Douglas' quote encapsulates the phenomenon of constructing moral boundaries and the implications of such demarcations for social dynamics and individual identities. It prompts critical reflection on the nature of social order, conformity, and exclusion, offering valuable insights into the complexities of human interactions and the construction of moral frameworks within communities. By delving into the intricacies of cultural boundaries and symbolic systems, Douglas' work continues to resonate as a pertinent lens through which to examine the dynamics of human societies and the perennial tension between insiders and outsiders.