Meaning: Abba Eban, a prominent Israeli diplomat, once said, "Consensus is what many people say in chorus but do not believe as individuals." This thought-provoking quote reflects the complex nature of consensus-building and the sometimes tenuous relationship between collective agreement and individual convictions.

At its core, consensus refers to a general agreement among a group of people. It is often seen as a desirable outcome in decision-making processes, as it implies that a diverse range of perspectives has been considered and reconciled. However, Eban's quote suggests that consensus can also be somewhat superficial, with individuals merely echoing the prevailing sentiment without truly embracing it on a personal level.

In many situations, especially in politics and diplomacy, consensus is sought after as a means of achieving unity and cooperation. It is seen as a sign of solidarity and common purpose, allowing for progress and resolution to be made on important issues. However, Eban's quote serves as a reminder that consensus does not necessarily reflect the genuine beliefs or convictions of each individual within the group.

This raises important questions about the nature of consensus and the dynamics of group decision-making. Is consensus always an accurate reflection of the collective will, or does it sometimes mask underlying disagreements and reservations? Are individuals pressured to conform to the consensus, even if it contradicts their personal beliefs? These are complex issues that touch on the psychology of conformity, group dynamics, and the balance between individual autonomy and collective action.

Eban's quote also highlights the potential disconnect between public declarations and private beliefs. It suggests that individuals may feel compelled to outwardly support a consensus position, even if they harbor doubts or reservations in their own minds. This phenomenon is not uncommon in various contexts, such as organizational settings, where employees may feel pressure to align with the prevailing consensus, regardless of their personal opinions.

Moreover, the quote implies a certain level of skepticism towards consensus, cautioning against an uncritical acceptance of the status quo. It prompts us to consider the depth and authenticity of consensus, urging us to look beyond the surface and explore the nuances of individual perspectives within the collective agreement.

In conclusion, Abba Eban's quote on consensus offers a thought-provoking perspective on the dynamics of group decision-making and the complexities of collective agreement. It challenges us to critically examine the nature of consensus, the relationship between public declarations and private beliefs, and the potential for superficial or insincere consensus. By delving into these themes, we can gain a deeper understanding of the intricacies of consensus-building and the delicate balance between collective unity and individual convictions.