The fact is that when it comes to judgment as to what should be secret and what should not be secret, Julian Assange's judgment has been pretty good so far.

Profession: Celebrity

Topics: Fact, Judgment, Pretty,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 18
Meaning: The quote you've provided is a statement by Daniel Ellsberg, a former United States military analyst who is best known for leaking the Pentagon Papers to the press in 1971. In this quote, Ellsberg is expressing his opinion about Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, and his ability to make judgments about what information should be kept confidential and what information should be made public.

Ellsberg's statement acknowledges Assange's track record in making judgments about the release of sensitive information. This is a significant endorsement coming from someone who has personal experience with the implications of leaking classified documents. To fully understand the significance of this quote, it's important to delve into the context and background of both individuals.

Julian Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who gained international prominence as the founder of WikiLeaks, a platform that facilitates the anonymous leaking of classified information. Assange and WikiLeaks have been involved in the publication of numerous high-profile leaks, including the Iraq and Afghanistan war logs, diplomatic cables, and the Guantanamo files. These disclosures sparked widespread debate about government transparency, freedom of the press, and the ethics of leaking classified information.

Daniel Ellsberg, on the other hand, is renowned for his role in leaking the Pentagon Papers, a top-secret Department of Defense study of U.S. political and military involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. Ellsberg's decision to release the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times and other newspapers was a watershed moment in the history of government transparency and the freedom of the press. His actions led to a landmark Supreme Court case that affirmed the right of the press to publish government secrets.

When Ellsberg speaks about Assange's judgment, he is drawing on his own experiences and expertise in evaluating the impact of leaked information. Ellsberg's implication is that Assange has demonstrated a discerning approach to deciding which information should be kept confidential and which should be made public. This endorsement carries weight due to Ellsberg's established reputation as a whistleblower and advocate for transparency.

It's important to note that Assange and WikiLeaks have been mired in controversy and legal challenges. Assange has faced allegations of sexual misconduct and extradition requests from the United States related to the publication of classified material. The complexities of these legal battles have contributed to polarized opinions about Assange and the activities of WikiLeaks.

In conclusion, Daniel Ellsberg's statement about Julian Assange's judgment reflects a nuanced perspective on the complexities of leaking sensitive information. It underscores the ongoing debate about government transparency, freedom of the press, and the ethical considerations surrounding the release of classified documents. The quote serves as a reminder of the enduring impact of whistleblowers and the evolving role of technology in shaping public discourse and accountability.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)