Meaning: Arthur Erickson, a renowned Canadian architect, made the statement "After 1980, you never heard reference to space again. Surface, the most convincing evidence of the descent into materialism, became the focus of design. Space disappeared." This quote reflects the shift in architectural and design trends that occurred in the late 20th century, particularly in the postmodern era. To understand the significance of this statement, it is essential to explore the context in which it was made and the broader implications for architectural and design principles.

In the decades leading up to 1980, modernist architectural and design movements emphasized the use of space as a fundamental element. Architects such as Le Corbusier and Mies van der Rohe promoted the idea of "less is more," focusing on open floor plans, clean lines, and the integration of interior and exterior spaces. This approach prioritized the experience of space and the interaction between the built environment and its occupants.

However, as the 1980s ushered in a new era, there was a noticeable shift in design philosophy. Postmodernism emerged as a critical response to the perceived limitations of modernism, rejecting its strict adherence to functionalism and minimalism. Instead, postmodern architects and designers embraced ornamentation, historical references, and a renewed interest in materiality and surface decoration.

Erickson's assertion that "you never heard reference to space again" reflects this shift in focus. The architectural discourse began to emphasize the superficial qualities of buildings, such as facades, cladding, and decorative elements, rather than the experiential qualities of space. This transformation signaled a departure from the modernist emphasis on spatial quality and a growing preoccupation with the visual and tactile aspects of the built environment.

The rise of consumerism and material culture in the 1980s also influenced design priorities. As society became more consumer-oriented, the aesthetics of products and built environments took on a heightened significance. Surface treatments and decorative elements became marketing tools, catering to a visually driven consumer culture. This shift aligned with Erickson's observation that "surface, the most convincing evidence of the descent into materialism, became the focus of design."

Furthermore, the disappearance of space from the architectural discourse may also be interpreted as a metaphor for a broader societal shift. As urbanization and globalization accelerated, physical space became increasingly contested and commodified. The built environment became more about creating iconic, image-driven structures and less about the thoughtful integration of spaces that fostered human interaction and well-being.

Erickson's critique of the diminishing importance of space in design serves as a reminder of the evolving values and priorities within the architectural profession. While the postmodern era brought about a reevaluation of architectural language and expression, it also raised questions about the loss of meaningful spatial experiences in the built environment.

In conclusion, Arthur Erickson's quote reflects a pivotal moment in architectural history, marking the transition from a focus on space to an emphasis on surface and materiality in design. The shift towards postmodernism, the influence of consumer culture, and broader societal changes all contributed to this evolution in architectural priorities. Erickson's observation serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the changing nature of architectural discourse and the implications for the human experience of the built environment.