Meaning: The quote by Susan Estrich touches upon the topic of affirmative action and the need to move on to a different approach. Affirmative action refers to policies and practices designed to promote the inclusion of individuals from groups that have been historically discriminated against, such as women, racial minorities, and individuals with disabilities, in areas such as employment, education, and business.

Estrich's statement suggests that affirmative action was not intended to be a permanent solution to address historical discrimination and inequality. Instead, it implies that there is a need to transition to a different approach that can effectively address these issues in a more sustainable and impactful manner.

Affirmative action has been a topic of debate and controversy since its inception. Proponents argue that it is necessary to level the playing field and provide opportunities for those who have been historically marginalized and discriminated against. They believe that affirmative action is a crucial tool for promoting diversity and addressing systemic inequalities in various sectors of society.

On the other hand, opponents of affirmative action argue that it can lead to reverse discrimination and that merit should be the sole basis for employment and educational opportunities. They contend that affirmative action policies may create unfair advantages or disadvantages based on characteristics such as race or gender.

Estrich's quote reflects a perspective that acknowledges the importance of addressing historical discrimination and inequality while also recognizing the limitations of affirmative action as a long-term solution. It suggests that there is a need to explore alternative approaches that can address these issues in a more comprehensive and sustainable manner.

One potential alternative approach to affirmative action is the implementation of targeted programs and initiatives aimed at addressing specific barriers to equality and opportunity. This could include efforts to address disparities in educational resources, access to healthcare, and economic opportunities. By focusing on targeted interventions, it may be possible to address the root causes of inequality more effectively.

Another approach that could be considered is the implementation of policies and practices that promote diversity and inclusion without relying solely on affirmative action measures. This could involve fostering inclusive organizational cultures, implementing unconscious bias training, and creating opportunities for mentorship and career development for underrepresented groups.

Estrich's quote also raises the question of whether there is a need to reevaluate the effectiveness of affirmative action in achieving its intended goals. It suggests that there may be a need for a more nuanced and comprehensive approach to addressing historical discrimination and inequality.

In conclusion, Susan Estrich's quote highlights the evolving nature of the discussion surrounding affirmative action and the need to consider alternative approaches to address historical discrimination and inequality. It invites reflection on the effectiveness of current policies and the potential for new strategies to promote diversity, inclusion, and equality. As society continues to grapple with these complex issues, it is essential to engage in thoughtful dialogue and exploration of innovative solutions to create a more equitable and inclusive future.