Meaning: This quote by Joe Eszterhas, a well-known screenwriter and author, touches on the idea of collective action and the potential impact it can have on societal issues, particularly in the context of taxation and government policies. In this quote, Eszterhas suggests that individuals have the power to effect change by coming together and refusing to comply with certain regulations or demands imposed by authorities, such as the California Tax Commission in this case.

Eszterhas' reference to the California Tax Commission highlights a specific example of a government entity responsible for implementing and enforcing tax laws and regulations in the state of California. His suggestion that people "started banding together and saying no to this" reflects a sentiment of resistance and non-compliance with the decisions and actions of such governing bodies. Eszterhas seems to believe that if individuals collectively refuse to adhere to certain regulations or taxes, it could lead to a larger movement or "snowball effect" that could potentially influence change.

The concept of collective action and civil disobedience has a long history in social and political movements. It is rooted in the idea that individuals, when united in purpose and action, can exert significant influence and challenge established norms and policies. This approach has been employed in various contexts, from labor rights and civil rights movements to environmental activism and anti-government protests.

In the context of taxation, the idea of collective resistance has been explored in various forms. Tax resistance, for example, is a form of direct action and civil disobedience in which individuals refuse to pay taxes as a means of protest against specific government policies or actions. This tactic has been utilized by various groups and individuals throughout history to challenge perceived injustices or grievances related to taxation and government spending.

Eszterhas' suggestion that people "band together" and refuse to comply with the California Tax Commission's regulations reflects a belief in the power of collective action to challenge and potentially change the status quo. The notion of a "snowball effect" suggests that such resistance, if widespread and sustained, could gain momentum and ultimately influence policy changes or reforms.

It is important to note that while collective action and civil disobedience can be powerful tools for advocating change, they also carry potential risks and consequences. Individuals who engage in acts of resistance, including tax resistance, may face legal repercussions and other forms of backlash from authorities. Additionally, the effectiveness of such tactics depends on various factors, including the level of participation, public support, and the receptiveness of decision-makers to the concerns being raised.

In conclusion, Joe Eszterhas' quote reflects a belief in the potential impact of collective action and resistance in challenging government policies and regulations, particularly in the realm of taxation. While the idea of individuals "banding together" to oppose the California Tax Commission's actions may seem provocative, it underscores the broader theme of citizen empowerment and the potential for grassroots movements to effect change. Whether through tax resistance or other forms of collective action, the quote highlights the enduring relevance of civil disobedience as a means of challenging authority and advocating for societal change.