Meaning: This quote by Daniel Evans, a prominent American politician and former governor of Washington, reflects his experience with the educational and training requirements during his time in the Navy. The quote highlights the structured and regimented nature of naval training, where a significant portion of the curriculum is devoted to naval-specific courses, while the remainder focuses on engineering education.

When Daniel Evans mentions that "there was no choice" in the Navy, he is likely referring to the mandatory nature of the training program. In the military, individuals are expected to adhere to the prescribed training regimen and fulfill the requirements set forth by their respective branches. This often means that there is limited flexibility in choosing the courses or subjects one wishes to pursue, as the training is designed to equip personnel with the necessary skills and knowledge for their roles within the Navy.

The division of training hours between naval courses and engineering underscores the multifaceted nature of the education provided to naval personnel. On one hand, the emphasis on naval courses ensures that individuals are well-versed in the specific protocols, procedures, and knowledge relevant to naval operations. This could encompass areas such as navigation, seamanship, naval history, and tactics, all of which are crucial for effective functioning within the Navy.

On the other hand, the inclusion of engineering education reflects the technical and practical aspects of naval operations. Given the complex and sophisticated technology utilized in naval vessels and equipment, it is essential for personnel to have a solid understanding of engineering principles, mechanics, and systems. This training equips individuals with the skills necessary to maintain, troubleshoot, and operate the various mechanical and electrical components integral to naval infrastructure.

The parallel focus on naval and engineering education also speaks to the diverse skill set required of naval personnel. In addition to being proficient in the specialized knowledge related to naval operations, individuals must also possess a strong foundation in engineering disciplines. This combination of expertise enables sailors to adapt to a wide range of responsibilities and challenges, whether they involve traditional naval duties or technical tasks related to the maintenance and functionality of naval assets.

Daniel Evans' reflection on his experience in the Navy serves as a testament to the comprehensive nature of military training and the unique blend of knowledge it imparts to its personnel. The structured division of training hours between naval and engineering courses underscores the rigorous and holistic approach taken to prepare individuals for their roles within the Navy.

In conclusion, Daniel Evans' quote sheds light on the structured training regimen in the Navy, where a balance is struck between specialized naval education and engineering knowledge. This approach ensures that naval personnel are equipped with the diverse skills and expertise necessary to navigate the complex and demanding landscape of naval operations.