Meaning: Millicent Fawcett, a prominent British suffragist, made this statement in her book "Political Economy for Beginners," published in 1870. In this quote, she refers to John Stuart Mill, a renowned philosopher and political economist of the 19th century. Fawcett suggests that many of Mill's supporters in the 1865 election were not fully aware of his specific political opinions but rather voted for him based on his reputation as a great thinker. This quote sheds light on the influence of reputation and public perception in political campaigns and highlights the role of intellectual authority in shaping public opinion.

John Stuart Mill was a highly influential figure in the realms of philosophy, economics, and politics during the 19th century. His works, including "On Liberty" and "Utilitarianism," continue to be studied and referenced in academic and political discourse. Mill was a staunch advocate of individual liberty, women's rights, and utilitarian principles, and his ideas have had a lasting impact on political thought.

The 1865 election referred to in Fawcett's quote was a significant moment in British political history. John Stuart Mill, a supporter of women's suffrage and other progressive causes, ran for a seat in the British Parliament as a candidate for the borough of Westminster. His campaign was notable for its emphasis on liberal and egalitarian principles, and he garnered support from various segments of society.

Fawcett's assertion that many of Mill's supporters were drawn to him primarily for his reputation as a great thinker reflects the broader phenomenon of intellectual celebrity and the influence of public perception in politics. It suggests that Mill's stature as a prominent philosopher and advocate for social reform played a pivotal role in attracting voters to his cause, even if they were not fully acquainted with the specifics of his political platform.

The notion that voters may support a candidate based on their general reputation rather than a comprehensive understanding of their political viewpoints raises important questions about the dynamics of electoral decision-making. It underscores the significance of public image, intellectual authority, and the power of ideas in shaping political outcomes.

Moreover, Fawcett's observation invites reflection on the nature of political engagement and the ways in which individuals form their allegiances in the electoral arena. It prompts consideration of the role of public intellectuals and thought leaders in influencing public opinion and mobilizing support for political causes.

In conclusion, Millicent Fawcett's quote about John Stuart Mill's supporters in the 1865 election offers valuable insights into the interplay of reputation, intellectual authority, and political engagement. It serves as a reminder of the enduring impact of influential thinkers on the political landscape and the complex dynamics of voter decision-making. Fawcett's commentary continues to provoke thought about the role of ideas and public perception in shaping political movements and the enduring legacy of intellectual figures in the realm of politics.