Meaning: Lion Feuchtwanger, a renowned German-Jewish novelist and playwright, in this quote, presents a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of history and human society. He suggests that both historians and novelists perceive history as a conflict between a small minority of enlightened individuals who possess the capacity and will to make rational judgments, and a large, unthinking majority driven by instinct and unable to think critically for themselves. This quote encapsulates Feuchtwanger's view of history as a perpetual struggle between the enlightened few and the ignorant many.

Feuchtwanger's assertion can be examined through a historical and literary lens, as he was not only a novelist but also an astute observer of historical events. From a historical standpoint, Feuchtwanger's quote resonates with the concept of intellectual and social elites shaping the course of human affairs. Throughout history, it is often a select group of leaders, thinkers, and innovators who have driven progress and change, while the broader population has followed or resisted these developments. This portrayal of history underscores the influence of a minority of influential figures in shaping events, ideas, and societal norms.

Moreover, Feuchtwanger's perspective can also be understood in the context of literature and storytelling. As a novelist, he was acutely aware of the power of narrative in shaping perceptions of history and human behavior. In many literary works, protagonists often represent the minority of individuals who possess agency, insight, and the ability to drive the plot forward, while the supporting characters or the populace at large are often depicted as passive, easily swayed, or driven by base instincts. Feuchtwanger's quote reflects the recurring theme in literature of the struggle between a discerning few and a passive or misguided many.

Feuchtwanger's view of history as a clash between a minority of enlightened individuals and a majority driven by instinct echoes the philosophical concept of the "enlightened few" versus the "masses." This dichotomy has been explored by various thinkers throughout history, including Plato, who envisioned a society governed by philosopher-kings, and Friedrich Nietzsche, who distinguished between the "herd" and the "overman." Feuchtwanger's quote aligns with the idea that history is shaped by the tension between those who possess intellectual clarity and agency and those who are driven by primal impulses and collective conformity.

This perspective also resonates with the ongoing debates about the role of elites and the masses in shaping society. Sociologists and political theorists have long discussed the influence of elites, intellectuals, and opinion leaders in driving social change and shaping public opinion. Feuchtwanger's quote encapsulates this dynamic, highlighting the tension between those who lead and those who follow, between critical thinking and herd mentality.

In conclusion, Lion Feuchtwanger's quote offers a profound insight into the nature of history and human society. It presents a dichotomy between a minority of enlightened individuals capable of making judgments and a vast majority driven by instinct and lacking independent thought. This perspective resonates with historical, literary, and philosophical analyses of the dynamics of power, influence, and agency in human affairs. Feuchtwanger's quote invites reflection on the role of intellectual and social elites, the power of narrative and storytelling, and the perennial struggle between individual insight and collective conformity in shaping the course of history.