Meaning: The quote by journalist Howard Fineman addresses the concept of confirming information in journalism, particularly in light of the popular dogma that emerged in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal. In this quote, Fineman acknowledges the importance of verifying stories through multiple sources, but also emphasizes the various methods and approaches that can be used to check the accuracy of a story.

In the context of Watergate, the scandal that ultimately led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon, the role of journalism in uncovering and exposing the truth became a pivotal moment in the history of the United States. The investigative reporting by journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who relied on the guidance of their anonymous source "Deep Throat," played a crucial role in unraveling the intricate web of political misconduct and corruption. This historical backdrop serves as a significant reference point for understanding the quote by Howard Fineman.

The notion of "two sources on a story" refers to the journalistic principle that emphasizes the importance of corroborating information from at least two independent and reliable sources before reporting a story. This practice aims to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the information being presented to the public. The rationale behind this approach is to minimize the risk of relying on potentially biased or unreliable sources, thereby upholding the integrity of journalism.

Fineman's acknowledgment of the validity of this principle reflects an understanding of its enduring significance in journalistic practice. The emphasis on verification through multiple sources is rooted in the commitment to thorough and responsible reporting, particularly in cases where the information at hand carries significant implications for the public interest.

However, the quote also underscores the recognition that the process of confirming a story goes beyond the strict adherence to a specific number of sources. It acknowledges that there are "all kinds of ways to check" the veracity of a story. This broader perspective highlights the multifaceted nature of journalistic inquiry and fact-checking, encompassing a range of investigative techniques and approaches.

In the contemporary media landscape, the advent of digital technology and social media has further complicated the task of verifying information. The rapid dissemination of news and the proliferation of diverse sources have heightened the need for journalists to navigate an increasingly complex terrain of information, disinformation, and misinformation.

As such, the quote by Howard Fineman serves as a reminder of the evolving challenges and responsibilities that confront journalists in their pursuit of accurate and reliable reporting. It encourages a nuanced and comprehensive approach to fact-checking, one that acknowledges the significance of multiple sources while also embracing the diverse methodologies available for scrutinizing the information presented in a story.

Ultimately, the quote captures the essence of journalistic diligence and the enduring quest for truth in the face of evolving media dynamics. It reflects a commitment to upholding the principles of integrity and accuracy in reporting, while recognizing the adaptive nature of the journalistic process in an ever-changing information landscape.

In conclusion, Howard Fineman's quote provides valuable insight into the complexities of confirming stories in journalism, drawing on the historical legacy of Watergate while acknowledging the multifaceted nature of fact-checking in contemporary media. It underscores the enduring relevance of the principle of multiple sources while also embracing the diverse strategies and approaches that underpin the pursuit of truthful and impactful journalism.