Meaning: This quote by journalist Robert Fisk alludes to the complex and often contentious relationships that the United States has had with other nations, particularly in the context of military intervention and economic interests. The quote suggests a degree of skepticism and irony regarding the motives and consequences of American foreign policy. In analyzing this quote, it is important to consider the historical context of U.S. foreign relations, the impact of military interventions, and the role of economic interests in shaping international interactions.

The mention of "President Bush" in the quote likely refers to former U.S. President George W. Bush, under whose administration the United States engaged in military interventions in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan. These interventions were framed as efforts to promote democracy, combat terrorism, and eliminate perceived threats to global security. However, they were also widely criticized for their human and economic costs, as well as for their long-term geopolitical implications.

The reference to "new 'friends' of America" highlights the often transactional nature of international alliances, with the U.S. seeking to cultivate relationships with other nations based on shared strategic interests. These alliances can be fluid and subject to change based on shifting geopolitical dynamics and perceived threats. The use of quotation marks around "friends" suggests a degree of skepticism regarding the sincerity and depth of these alliances, implying that they may be driven more by expediency and mutual benefit than genuine friendship.

The phrase "to open a new relationship with the world" reflects the U.S.'s desire to shape global dynamics in line with its own interests and values. It suggests a proactive approach to international relations, wherein the U.S. seeks to assert its influence and leadership on the world stage. This ambition has manifested in various forms, including diplomatic initiatives, trade agreements, and military alliances, all of which aim to position the U.S. as a dominant player in shaping global affairs.

The mention of "new economic fortunes for those who 'liberated' them" raises questions about the economic motivations underlying U.S. military interventions. The use of the term "liberated" in quotation marks implies a critical stance toward the rhetoric used to justify military actions, suggesting that the notion of liberation may be a veneer for economic and strategic interests. This allusion to economic fortunes underscores the intertwined nature of military and economic agendas in U.S. foreign policy, raising important ethical and moral considerations about the true motives behind such interventions.

In conclusion, Robert Fisk's quote encapsulates a critical perspective on U.S. foreign policy, highlighting the complexities and contradictions inherent in America's interactions with the world. It prompts us to reflect on the multifaceted dimensions of international relations, including the interplay of military power, economic interests, and the rhetoric used to justify global interventions. By delving into the nuances of this quote, we gain valuable insights into the challenges and dilemmas that characterize the United States' role in the international arena.