Meaning: This quote by Robert M. La Follette, a prominent American politician, encapsulates a timeless truth about the nature of war and the motivations behind it. La Follette, who served as a U.S. Senator from Wisconsin and ran for president as a progressive candidate in 1924, was a vocal critic of American involvement in World War I. His words reflect a deep skepticism of the justifications put forth for engaging in war and the tendency for those advocating for conflict to manipulate or create pretexts to suit their agendas.

La Follette's assertion that "If there is no sufficient reason for war, the war party will make war on one pretext, then invent another... after the war is on" speaks to the idea that those who are eager for war will find or create reasons to justify it, even if the original justifications are unfounded or insufficient. This notion has been echoed throughout history by various political leaders, scholars, and activists who have sought to bring attention to the complex and often murky motives behind military conflicts.

One interpretation of this quote is that it highlights the role of propaganda and manipulation in the lead-up to war. In the pursuit of their objectives, war parties may exploit public sentiment, disseminate misleading information, or manufacture crises to rally support for military action. Once a conflict has begun, the original reasons for going to war may become less relevant or may be overshadowed by new justifications that emerge in the course of the conflict.

This perspective is particularly relevant in the context of modern warfare, where the media, public opinion, and international relations play significant roles in shaping the narrative and rationale for military interventions. The quote also calls attention to the concept of "war hawks" and their propensity to advocate for aggressive foreign policies and military interventions, often using shifting or evolving justifications to advance their agenda.

Furthermore, La Follette's words prompt reflection on the ethical and moral considerations surrounding war. By suggesting that war parties may resort to inventing pretexts for conflict, he raises important questions about the legitimacy of war and the responsibility of political leaders to justify the decision to engage in armed conflict. This quote encourages scrutiny of the true motivations behind war and challenges the notion that all wars are fought for noble or righteous causes.

In summary, Robert M. La Follette's quote serves as a cautionary reminder of the potential for manipulation, misinformation, and shifting justifications in the lead-up to war. It calls for a critical examination of the reasons put forth for military action and underscores the need for transparency, accountability, and ethical deliberation in matters of war and peace. As a prominent figure in American history, La Follette's words continue to resonate as a thought-provoking commentary on the dynamics of war and the forces driving it.