Meaning: This quote by E.M. Forster, the renowned English novelist, delves into the subtle yet crucial distinction between coarseness and vulgarity. It suggests that while both qualities may seem similar on the surface, they differ in their underlying implications. Forster's insight prompts us to consider the deeper meanings and societal implications of these traits.

Coarseness, as Forster describes it, is characterized by a lack of refinement or subtlety. It is unapologetically raw and unfiltered, often revealing aspects of human nature or society that are deemed unpleasant or unsophisticated. Coarseness does not seek to conceal or sugarcoat reality; instead, it brings forth the unvarnished truth, even if it may be uncomfortable or confronting. In this sense, coarseness can be seen as a form of honesty, as it exposes the unadorned realities of life without pretense or artifice.

On the other hand, Forster contrasts coarseness with vulgarity, which he suggests involves an element of concealment. Vulgarity is not merely a lack of refinement, but rather a deliberate obscuring or distorting of truth or beauty. It embodies a certain falseness or artificiality that seeks to mask the underlying realities or present a distorted version of them. While coarseness may be considered confrontational or abrasive, vulgarity operates in a more insidious manner, manipulating perceptions and obscuring genuine emotions or experiences.

Forster's distinction between coarseness and vulgarity invites us to consider the ways in which these qualities manifest in art, literature, and human behavior. In literature, for example, a writer's use of coarse language or graphic descriptions may serve to expose the rawness of human experience, unearthing the often messy and unrefined aspects of life. This unfiltered portrayal can be a powerful tool for eliciting emotional responses and prompting introspection in the reader.

Conversely, vulgarity in literature might involve the use of contrived or artificial language and imagery to obfuscate the true nature of characters or situations. This could be a deliberate attempt to manipulate the reader's perceptions or to create a false sense of sophistication or profundity. By employing a veneer of artificiality, the writer may seek to conceal the underlying truths and complexities of the human experience, ultimately detracting from the authenticity and emotional impact of the work.

In broader societal contexts, the distinction between coarseness and vulgarity is equally relevant. In human interactions, for instance, individuals may exhibit coarseness by expressing raw emotions or opinions in a direct and unfiltered manner. While this can sometimes lead to discomfort or conflict, it also allows for genuine and unvarnished communication. Conversely, acts of vulgarity in social interactions might involve disingenuous displays of politeness or decorum that mask underlying insincerity or manipulation.

Understanding Forster's distinction can prompt us to critically examine the ways in which we engage with art, literature, and each other. It encourages a discerning approach to discerning the genuine from the artificial, the authentic from the contrived. By recognizing the implications of coarseness and vulgarity, we can cultivate a deeper appreciation for honesty, authenticity, and genuine human connection in all aspects of life.