Meaning: This quote by E. M. Forster, the renowned English novelist, encapsulates the often fleeting and inconsequential nature of many quarrels and conflicts. It suggests that in the heat of the moment, disagreements may seem unavoidable and significant, but in hindsight, they appear trivial and easily resolvable. E. M. Forster's observation reflects the common experience of realizing the transient and unimportant nature of many disputes once emotions have settled and perspective has been gained.

Quarrels and conflicts are a natural part of human interaction. Whether they occur in personal relationships, professional settings, or broader societal contexts, disagreements often arise due to differences in perspectives, values, or interests. In the midst of these conflicts, emotions can run high, leading to a sense of urgency and significance that may not withstand the test of time.

One of the reasons why quarrels appear inevitable in the moment is the intensity of emotions involved. When individuals are embroiled in a dispute, their feelings of anger, frustration, or hurt can dominate their thoughts and actions, making it difficult to see beyond the immediate conflict. In such instances, the ability to recognize the transitory nature of the disagreement is often clouded by the emotional turmoil of the present moment.

Furthermore, the circumstances surrounding a quarrel can contribute to the perception of its inevitability. Issues that trigger conflicts may seem pressing and insurmountable at the time, leading individuals to believe that a confrontation or disagreement is unavoidable. Whether it involves personal misunderstandings, professional disagreements, or societal tensions, the factors driving the conflict can create a sense of immediacy and inescapability.

However, E. M. Forster's assertion that most quarrels are "incredible afterwards" highlights the perspective that emerges once emotions have subsided and rationality has been restored. In the aftermath of a conflict, individuals often come to realize that the issues that led to the quarrel were not as significant as they initially seemed. This realization underscores the fleeting nature of many disputes and the potential for resolution and reconciliation once emotions have settled.

In many cases, the passage of time allows individuals to gain a more balanced and objective view of the conflict. They may recognize that the issues at the heart of the quarrel were not as insurmountable as they appeared in the heat of the moment. This newfound perspective can pave the way for communication, understanding, and ultimately, the resolution of the conflict.

Moreover, E. M. Forster's quote alludes to the role of hindsight in shaping our understanding of quarrels. Looking back on past conflicts, individuals often find it difficult to comprehend why they allowed a seemingly significant disagreement to escalate. This retrospective incredulity underscores the ephemeral nature of many quarrels and the realization that they were not as inevitable as they once seemed.

In conclusion, E. M. Forster's quote offers a thought-provoking reflection on the nature of quarrels and conflicts. It prompts individuals to consider the fleeting significance of many disagreements and the transformative effect of hindsight. By acknowledging the inevitability of quarrels in the moment and their incredibility afterwards, Forster's observation encourages a broader perspective on conflicts, emphasizing the potential for resolution, reconciliation, and personal growth once emotions have subsided.