Meaning: The quote you've provided is from E.M. Forster, a prominent English novelist, and it delves into the role of a historian and the importance of understanding human behavior. Let's break down the quote and explore its significance in the context of historical research and writing.

Forster's quote begins with the assertion that a historian must have some understanding of how individuals who are not historians behave. This statement highlights the idea that history is fundamentally about people and their actions, decisions, and interactions. To truly comprehend and interpret historical events, a historian needs to have insight into the motivations, beliefs, and societal norms that influenced the individuals involved.

The quote also suggests that without this understanding, a historian risks operating in a realm removed from the vitality of human experience. In essence, Forster is cautioning that detached, purely academic or theoretical approaches to history may lead to a superficial or distorted portrayal of the past. To truly bring history to life and make it relevant to contemporary audiences, historians must be able to connect with the lived experiences of the people they study.

Forster then introduces the notion that gaining an understanding of human behavior requires personal experience. This assertion implies that historical inquiry is not solely an intellectual pursuit but also a deeply human one. Through personal experiences, such as engaging with diverse cultures, witnessing social dynamics, or grappling with moral dilemmas, historians can develop a richer and more nuanced comprehension of human behavior throughout different historical eras.

However, Forster also acknowledges that the ability to effectively incorporate personal experiences into historical analysis is not a given. He suggests that this task requires a certain level of genius. This raises the question of what constitutes genius in historical research. It could be argued that genius, in this context, refers to the capacity to synthesize personal experiences with scholarly rigor, empathy, and creativity, ultimately producing historical narratives that resonate with readers on a profound level.

In unpacking Forster's quote, it becomes evident that he is advocating for a holistic approach to historical inquiry. This approach emphasizes the importance of empathy, imagination, and an intimate understanding of human behavior in crafting compelling and authentic narratives of the past. By recognizing the essential role of personal experience and the challenges of integrating it into historical scholarship, Forster encourages historians to approach their work with a deep sense of engagement and connection to the human stories they seek to convey.

In conclusion, E.M. Forster's quote provides a thought-provoking reflection on the nature of historical inquiry and the qualities required to breathe life into the past. It underscores the significance of understanding human behavior, the value of personal experiences in historical research, and the transformative potential of genius in historical storytelling. By heeding Forster's insights, historians can strive to create narratives that not only illuminate the complexities of the past but also resonate with the human experiences of contemporary audiences.