Meaning: The quote by Alan Dean Foster reflects on the evolution of science fiction (SF) literature and the increasing volume of new SF works being produced. Foster, a prolific author known for his contributions to the science fiction genre, acknowledges the growing availability of SF literature since he began his writing career. However, he also raises the concern that alongside the increase in quantity, there is also a proliferation of subpar or "bad" SF works. In essence, Foster suggests that the expansion of the SF market has led to a wider range of quality, posing a challenge in discerning whether the overall standard of the genre has been positively impacted.

Alan Dean Foster's observation about the proliferation of new SF works is particularly significant in the context of the genre's popularity and influence. Science fiction has long been a dynamic and diverse literary domain, encompassing a wide array of themes, styles, and subgenres. From classic space operas to dystopian futures, SF has captivated readers with its imaginative narratives and thought-provoking explorations of technology, society, and the human condition. As the genre continues to attract both established and emerging writers, the sheer volume of new SF releases has undoubtedly increased over the years.

The notion that the increased availability of SF literature may also lead to a rise in "bad" SF raises questions about the quality and diversity of the genre's contemporary output. With more authors entering the SF landscape, there is a natural variation in the creative and technical proficiency of their works. While the expansion of the SF market allows for a greater diversity of voices and perspectives, it also presents challenges in maintaining a consistently high standard of storytelling, world-building, and thematic depth. This phenomenon is not unique to SF, as the democratization of publishing and the rise of digital platforms have similarly impacted other literary genres.

Foster's contemplation on whether there is also an increase in "good" SF amidst the influx of new works underscores the ongoing debate about the state of the genre. As the volume of SF literature continues to expand, the assessment of its overall quality and impact becomes a complex endeavor. Future historians and critics of the genre will play a crucial role in evaluating the lasting significance of contemporary SF works, determining which contributions have enriched the genre and advanced its artistic and intellectual boundaries.

In the context of Foster's quote, the role of future historians of the SF field becomes particularly relevant. These scholars and critics will undertake the task of assessing the literary legacy of contemporary SF, identifying works that have made enduring contributions to the genre's evolution. By critically evaluating the themes, styles, and innovations present in new SF literature, future historians will contribute to a deeper understanding of the genre's trajectory and the enduring impact of individual works and authors.

In conclusion, Alan Dean Foster's quote encapsulates the evolving landscape of science fiction literature, characterized by the increasing availability of new SF works. While acknowledging the potential for a greater diversity of voices and ideas within the genre, Foster also raises concerns about the proliferation of "bad" SF. His contemplation on the presence of "good" SF amidst this expansion invites reflection on the ongoing evolution and assessment of the genre's contemporary output. As the SF market continues to grow, the role of future historians and critics in evaluating the quality and significance of new SF works becomes pivotal in shaping the understanding of the genre's enduring legacy.