Meaning: Felix Frankfurter, a prominent figure in American legal history, made this statement as part of his dissenting opinion in the 1938 case of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins. The quote reflects the principle of judicial restraint and the idea that judges should interpret the law based on its original meaning and intent, rather than injecting their personal beliefs or policy preferences into their decisions.

In his dissent, Frankfurter argued that the role of a judge is to interpret and apply the law, rather than to impose their own views on the Constitution. He emphasized the importance of adhering to the text and history of the Constitution, as well as to legal precedent, rather than allowing personal opinions to influence judicial decisions.

This principle of judicial restraint is rooted in the concept of separation of powers and the idea that the judiciary should not overstep its constitutional role by making policy decisions that are the purview of the legislative and executive branches. Frankfurter's quote underscores the importance of maintaining the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary by avoiding the temptation to use judicial power to advance personal or political agendas.

Frankfurter's perspective on judicial restraint has been influential in shaping the role of the judiciary in American law. It reflects a commitment to the rule of law and the idea that judges should interpret and apply the law in a manner that is consistent with the Constitution and legal principles, rather than seeking to impose their own policy preferences.

Moreover, Frankfurter's quote highlights the significance of the Constitution as the foundation of the legal system and the need for judges to respect its authority and limitations. By acknowledging that personal notions of policy should not be written into the Constitution, Frankfurter emphasizes the importance of preserving the integrity and stability of the legal framework established by the Constitution.

In a broader sense, Frankfurter's quote speaks to the idea of judicial independence and the crucial role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law. It underscores the need for judges to exercise their authority with restraint and respect for the principles of the legal system, rather than allowing personal beliefs to dictate their decisions.

In conclusion, Felix Frankfurter's quote encapsulates the principle of judicial restraint and the importance of upholding the rule of law in the American legal system. It reflects a commitment to interpreting the law based on its original meaning and intent, rather than allowing personal opinions to influence judicial decisions. By emphasizing the significance of the Constitution and the role of the judiciary in preserving its authority, Frankfurter's quote continues to resonate as a reminder of the responsibilities and limitations of judicial power.