Meaning: This quote by James Frazer, a Scottish social anthropologist, highlights a common tendency among scientists and scholars to view humanity in a narrow and abstract manner. Frazer suggests that both the man of science and the man of letters, referring to those who are well-versed in literature and the humanities, often focus on only one aspect of the multifaceted nature of human beings. This quote invites us to consider the limitations of viewing humanity through a singular lens and encourages a more holistic understanding of our complex and diverse nature.

In this quote, Frazer draws attention to the tendency of individuals immersed in the pursuit of knowledge, whether in the scientific or literary realm, to overlook the full spectrum of human experience. When he refers to "the man of science," he is alluding to those who are deeply engrossed in the study of natural phenomena, often employing empirical methods and rational analysis to understand the world. On the other hand, "the man of letters" encompasses individuals who are inclined towards the study of language, literature, and the arts, often emphasizing the emotional and subjective aspects of human existence.

By suggesting that these individuals are "too apt to view mankind only in the abstract," Frazer implies that their perspectives may be limited by their specialized focus, leading them to overlook the intricate and multifaceted nature of humanity. The "abstract" view of mankind could involve a reductionist approach, where only certain aspects of human existence are considered, neglecting the richness and diversity of human experiences.

Furthermore, Frazer's reference to "selecting in his consideration only a single side of our complex and many-sided being" underscores the idea that both the man of science and the man of letters may inadvertently neglect the multidimensionality of human nature. Whether driven by a quest for empirical evidence or a deep appreciation for cultural and artistic expressions, individuals may tend to emphasize only one aspect of human existence, thereby missing out on the richness and depth of the human experience as a whole.

It is important to note that Frazer's critique does not diminish the value of scientific or literary pursuits. Instead, it serves as a reminder that a comprehensive understanding of humanity necessitates an inclusive and interdisciplinary approach. By acknowledging the limitations of viewing mankind from a singular perspective, we can strive to embrace a more holistic understanding that integrates scientific, artistic, cultural, and social dimensions.

In conclusion, James Frazer's quote prompts us to reflect on the inherent tendency to view humanity through a narrow and abstract lens, whether in the realms of science or literature. By recognizing the limitations of such a perspective, we can strive to cultivate a more comprehensive understanding of human nature that embraces its diverse and multifaceted aspects. This quote serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of integrating various perspectives to gain a richer understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of humanity.