Meaning: The quote "Television was supposed to be a national park. Instead it has become a money machine. It's a commodity now, just like pork bellies" by Fred Friendly, a renowned producer, reflects a critical perspective on the evolution of television as a medium. In order to understand the context of this quote, it is important to consider the historical and cultural significance of television and how it has transformed over time.

Television was initially envisioned as a public service, a means of mass communication that would inform, educate, and entertain the populace. In its early years, it was often referred to as a "vast wasteland" by its critics, who lamented the proliferation of low-quality programming and the commercialization of the medium. Fred Friendly's quote captures this sentiment, highlighting the stark contrast between the original idealism of television as a national park – a public space for cultural enrichment and collective experience – and its current state as a money-driven industry.

The analogy of television being compared to a "money machine" and a "commodity" like pork bellies underscores the transformation of the medium into a commercial enterprise. This transformation has been driven by various factors, including the rise of advertising, corporate ownership of networks, and the pursuit of profit in an increasingly competitive media landscape. As a result, the original vision of television as a public service has been overshadowed by commercial imperatives, with programming decisions often driven by ratings, advertising revenue, and market demands.

Fred Friendly's quote also alludes to the commodification of television content, highlighting how it has become a tradable asset akin to pork bellies – a commodity traded on futures markets. This comparison underscores the detachment of television from its original purpose of serving the public interest, as it has become a product to be bought and sold in the marketplace. The shift towards a profit-driven model has raised concerns about the quality and diversity of programming, as well as the impact on societal values and cultural expression.

In the contemporary media landscape, the dominance of commercial interests in television has led to debates about the role and responsibilities of broadcasters, the influence of advertising on content, and the implications for democracy and public discourse. The quote by Fred Friendly serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges and tensions inherent in the commercialization of television, and the need to critically evaluate its impact on society and culture.

In conclusion, Fred Friendly's quote encapsulates a thought-provoking critique of the transformation of television from a national park to a money machine. It prompts us to reflect on the evolution of television as a medium, the tensions between commercial imperatives and public service ideals, and the implications for media, society, and culture. As television continues to evolve in the digital age, the quote remains relevant in sparking discussions about the role and future of this influential medium.