Meaning: The quote you have provided is not attributed to Robert Frost, but it does touch upon significant themes in political and social theory. The quote discusses the concept of power and the means through which it is maintained. It suggests that while violence may be a tool used by those in power to control the dominated, the most effective force in guaranteeing the long-term maintenance of power is the consent of the dominated to their own domination.

This idea is deeply rooted in the work of political theorists and philosophers, particularly in the writings of thinkers such as Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci. Foucault, for example, explored the ways in which power operates through various institutions and practices in society, emphasizing the role of consent and normalization in maintaining power structures. Gramsci, on the other hand, developed the concept of cultural hegemony, which refers to the way in which dominant groups establish and maintain their power through the consent of the dominated, achieved through control of cultural institutions and ideologies.

The idea expressed in the quote also resonates with discussions of soft power, a concept popularized by political scientist Joseph Nye. Soft power refers to the ability to influence others through persuasion, attraction, and agenda-setting, as opposed to the use of coercion or force. In this context, consent becomes a crucial aspect of maintaining power, as it involves the voluntary acceptance and internalization of certain values, norms, and ideologies by the dominated.

Furthermore, the quote raises important questions about the nature of consent and the mechanisms through which it is obtained. It draws attention to the complex ways in which power operates, not only through explicit acts of violence or coercion, but also through subtler forms of influence, persuasion, and cultural hegemony. This aligns with broader discussions about the role of ideology, propaganda, and cultural production in shaping individuals' beliefs and attitudes, ultimately leading to their consent to systems of power and domination.

Moreover, the quote invites reflection on the dynamics of power and resistance. While it suggests that consent plays a significant role in maintaining power, it also implies the potential for resistance and contestation. This resonates with the ideas of political activism, social movements, and the ongoing struggle for emancipation and liberation from oppressive power structures. It prompts us to consider the conditions under which consent is formed, the possibilities for challenging and subverting dominant narratives, and the potential for collective action to disrupt existing power relations.

In conclusion, the quote captures the intricate relationship between power and consent, shedding light on the multifaceted ways in which power is maintained and contested within society. It invites us to critically examine the mechanisms through which consent is obtained and the implications of such consent for the perpetuation of power dynamics. By delving into these themes, we gain insight into the complexities of power, domination, and resistance, and the ongoing struggles for social and political change.