Meaning: Michael Gartner, an American journalist and former president of NBC News, made this statement about the state of newspapers in the modern era. The quote reflects his observation that contemporary newspapers lack the same level of passion, outrage, and personality that they once possessed. Gartner suggests that this change may be attributed to corporate decisions that have influenced the content and tone of newspapers.

Gartner's comment speaks to a larger debate about the role and influence of corporate ownership in the media industry. As newspapers have increasingly come under the control of large conglomerates and media organizations, there has been concern about the potential impact on journalistic independence, editorial freedom, and the diversity of voices and perspectives in reporting.

In the past, newspapers were often characterized by their distinct personalities, reflecting the values, perspectives, and priorities of their editorial teams and the communities they served. This individuality and passion often manifested in the form of strong opinions, investigative reporting, and a deep engagement with local and national issues. However, as Gartner suggests, the influence of corporate decision-making may have led to a homogenization of content and a dilution of the unique character that once defined newspapers.

One potential consequence of this shift is the perceived loss of authenticity and credibility in journalism. When newspapers are perceived as being driven by corporate interests rather than a commitment to truth, public trust in the media can be eroded. This can have significant implications for the functioning of democratic societies, where a free and independent press is essential for holding power to account and informing the public.

Moreover, the decline in passion and outrage in newspapers may also reflect broader shifts in media consumption and the challenges facing the traditional print industry. As digital platforms and social media have transformed the way people access news and information, newspapers have had to adapt to new modes of distribution and audience engagement. In this evolving landscape, the pressures of maintaining profitability and relevance in a crowded media environment may have influenced the editorial choices and content strategies of newspapers.

It is important to note that Gartner's perspective is just one of many viewpoints on the state of contemporary journalism. While his observation about the impact of corporate decision-making is a valid concern, it is also worth acknowledging the continued dedication and commitment of many journalists and editorial teams who strive to uphold the values of independent, ethical, and impactful reporting.

In conclusion, Michael Gartner's quote sheds light on the changing dynamics of the newspaper industry and the potential influence of corporate ownership on editorial content and the overall personality of newspapers. The debate about the role of corporate decision-making in shaping the media landscape underscores the importance of preserving journalistic independence, diversity of voices, and the passion and personality that have historically defined newspapers. As the media continues to evolve, maintaining a critical perspective on these issues is essential for upholding the integrity and impact of journalism in society.