Meaning: This quote by Elizabeth Gaskell, a renowned English novelist, reflects a sentiment often felt by individuals who are resistant to accepting outside perspectives or advice. In this quote, Gaskell captures the idea that some people may be dismissive of reason because they perceive it as a mere regurgitation of someone else's thoughts or opinions. The quote speaks to the human tendency to reject reason when it challenges our preconceived notions or desires, as well as the reluctance to consider alternative viewpoints.

Gaskell's words highlight the inherent challenge of engaging in reasoned discourse. When individuals are unwilling to listen to reason, they are effectively closing themselves off from the potential for growth and understanding. By attributing reason to "what someone else has got to say," Gaskell suggests that people may view reasoned arguments as external impositions rather than valuable contributions to their own understanding.

The quote also touches on the complexities of human communication and the dynamics of persuasion. It implies that when reason is presented, it is often perceived as a form of external influence, rather than a genuine attempt at meaningful dialogue. This sentiment speaks to the reluctance of individuals to entertain ideas that may challenge their existing beliefs or convictions.

Moreover, Gaskell's quote sheds light on the emotional aspect of reasoning. It suggests that there may be an underlying resistance to reason rooted in the fear of having one's own opinions invalidated or overshadowed by those of others. This fear can manifest as a refusal to engage in rational discourse, as individuals may feel threatened by the prospect of being swayed or influenced by external voices.

In a broader context, this quote also speaks to the challenges of fostering open, productive dialogue in society. It underscores the importance of empathy, understanding, and a willingness to engage with differing viewpoints. Gaskell's words serve as a reminder of the human tendency to prioritize personal convictions over reasoned discourse, and the need to overcome this resistance in order to foster meaningful communication and understanding.

In conclusion, Elizabeth Gaskell's quote encapsulates the complex dynamics of reasoned discourse and the inherent resistance that some individuals may harbor towards accepting outside perspectives. It highlights the emotional and psychological barriers that can hinder open dialogue and underscores the importance of empathy and understanding in engaging with differing viewpoints. By delving into the reluctance to listen to reason, Gaskell's words prompt us to reflect on the challenges of fostering meaningful communication and the value of embracing reasoned discourse as a pathway to growth and understanding.