Meaning: Clifford Geertz, a prominent American anthropologist, made the statement "Anthropology never has had a distinct subject matter, and because it doesn't have a real method, there's a great deal of anxiety over what it is." This quote captures the complex and evolving nature of anthropology as a discipline. Geertz's assertion invites us to delve into the multifaceted world of anthropology, exploring its subject matter, methods, and the ongoing debates and uncertainties that characterize the field.

Anthropology is the study of human beings, encompassing their biological evolution, cultural diversity, social structures, and behaviors. It is a discipline that seeks to understand the complexities of human existence across time and space. However, Geertz's statement challenges the notion of a distinct subject matter within anthropology. Unlike other scientific disciplines that may focus on specific natural phenomena or social processes, anthropology grapples with the entirety of human existence, making it difficult to pin down a singular subject matter.

Furthermore, Geertz highlights the absence of a "real method" in anthropology, alluding to the diverse and interdisciplinary nature of anthropological research. Anthropologists employ a wide array of methodologies, drawing from ethnography, archaeology, linguistics, and biological anthropology, among other approaches. This methodological diversity reflects the complexity of human societies and cultures, as well as the need for nuanced and context-specific research methods.

The "great deal of anxiety" that Geertz mentions speaks to the ongoing debates and uncertainties within the discipline. Anthropologists constantly grapple with questions about the nature of their research, the ethical implications of their work, and the best approaches to understanding and representing diverse cultures and societies. Additionally, the dynamic and ever-changing nature of human societies means that anthropology is a discipline in flux, continuously adapting to new challenges and perspectives.

Geertz's quote also sheds light on the reflexive nature of anthropology. As anthropologists study human cultures and societies, they are also embedded within the social and cultural contexts they seek to understand. This reflexivity introduces complexities and challenges to the discipline, as anthropologists navigate their own positionality and biases in their research.

Despite the lack of a distinct subject matter and a singular method, the open-ended nature of anthropology is also its strength. It allows for a rich and holistic understanding of human diversity, offering insights into the cultural, social, and biological dimensions of humanity. Anthropologists embrace the complexity and diversity of human experiences, striving to engage with different perspectives and worldviews.

In conclusion, Geertz's quote encapsulates the dynamic and multifaceted nature of anthropology. The absence of a distinct subject matter and a singular method speaks to the complexity and diversity of human cultures and societies, while also highlighting the ongoing debates and uncertainties within the discipline. Ultimately, anthropology's strength lies in its ability to grapple with the intricacies of human existence, offering valuable insights into the rich tapestry of human diversity.