Meaning: This quote by anthropologist Clifford Geertz addresses a common concern among younger anthropologists regarding the diversity and inclusivity of the field of anthropology. Geertz suggests that there is a perception among younger practitioners that the scope of anthropology is so vast and varied that almost any activity can be labeled as anthropology. This notion raises questions about the boundaries and identity of the discipline, as well as the potential for dilution or distortion of its core principles. To fully understand the significance of this quote, it is important to delve into the background of anthropology, the evolution of the field, and the ongoing debates about its boundaries and diversity.

Anthropology, as a discipline, encompasses the study of human societies and cultures, past and present, with a focus on understanding the diversity of human experiences and behaviors. It emerged in the 19th century as a response to the colonial encounters and the need to systematically study and comprehend the diverse cultures and societies encountered by European explorers and colonizers. Over time, anthropology has evolved into a multifaceted field with various subfields such as sociocultural anthropology, biological anthropology, archaeology, and linguistic anthropology.

The diversity within anthropology is evident in the wide range of research topics and methodologies employed by practitioners. Sociocultural anthropologists may study kinship systems, rituals, belief systems, and social organization within different societies, while biological anthropologists focus on human evolution, genetics, and primatology. Archaeologists explore material culture, ancient civilizations, and human-environment interactions, while linguistic anthropologists investigate language diversity, communication patterns, and language preservation. Additionally, applied anthropologists work in various settings such as development projects, public health initiatives, and cultural heritage preservation.

Geertz's concern about the infinite possibilities within anthropology reflects a broader debate within the discipline about its boundaries and core principles. Some argue that the inclusivity and diversity of anthropology are its strengths, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of human societies and cultures. Others, however, express concerns about the potential for dilution or fragmentation of the discipline, as well as the need for a coherent identity and set of principles.

The notion that "you can do anything and call it anthropology" raises questions about the validity and rigor of research conducted under the guise of anthropology. It highlights the importance of critically evaluating the methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and ethical considerations that underpin anthropological research. The concern is not about restricting the diversity of topics and approaches within anthropology but rather about ensuring that the work conducted under the name of anthropology adheres to the principles of scholarly inquiry, cultural sensitivity, and ethical engagement with research subjects.

In response to these concerns, the anthropological community has engaged in ongoing discussions about the nature of the discipline and its evolving boundaries. This includes debates about the decolonization of anthropology, the inclusion of diverse voices and perspectives, and the ethical challenges of conducting research in a globalized world. These discussions have led to a greater emphasis on reflexivity, collaboration, and ethical engagement with research subjects, as well as a recognition of the need to address power imbalances and historical injustices within the discipline.

In conclusion, Clifford Geertz's quote encapsulates the ongoing debates within anthropology about its diversity, inclusivity, and boundaries. While the field of anthropology is indeed vast and diverse, encompassing a wide range of topics and methodologies, there is a need for critical reflection on the identity and principles of the discipline. The quote serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding rigorous standards of research, ethical engagement, and reflexivity within anthropology, while also embracing the richness and complexity of human cultures and societies.