Meaning: This quote by anthropologist Clifford Geertz reflects on the evolution of anthropological writing and research practices during the 20th century. Geertz was a prominent figure in the field of anthropology, known for his influential work in symbolic anthropology and the study of culture. In this quote, he highlights the significant transformation that has occurred in the discipline's approach to research and writing over time.

Geertz's observation about the changing nature of anthropological writing and research from the early 20th century to the present day speaks to the dynamic and evolving nature of the discipline. In the early 20th century, anthropological writing often reflected the prevailing colonial and ethnocentric attitudes of the time. Anthropologists would often approach their subjects from a position of cultural superiority, leading to biased and inaccurate representations of the people and cultures they studied.

However, as the field of anthropology progressed, there was a notable shift in the way research was conducted and findings were presented. Anthropologists began to adopt a more reflexive and critical approach, acknowledging the influence of their own perspectives and biases on their work. This shift was accompanied by a growing emphasis on ethical research practices and a commitment to representing the voices and experiences of the communities being studied.

Geertz's reference to the "enormous shift" in anthropological writing alludes to the broader changes in the discipline's theoretical frameworks, methodological approaches, and ethical considerations. The emergence of postcolonial and feminist perspectives, as well as the influence of critical theory and postmodernism, has significantly impacted the way anthropologists engage with their subjects and communicate their findings.

One key aspect of this transformation is the recognition of the complexities and nuances of culture, challenging earlier simplistic and reductive portrayals. Anthropologists now strive to capture the multifaceted nature of human societies, emphasizing the importance of context, interpretation, and the diversity of human experiences. This shift has led to a more nuanced and empathetic portrayal of the people and cultures under study, moving away from the objectifying and dehumanizing tendencies of earlier anthropological writing.

Moreover, Geertz's remark about the inability to attribute this shift to a single individual underscores the collective nature of this transformation. The evolution of anthropological writing has been shaped by the contributions of numerous scholars, activists, and communities who have challenged and reimagined the discipline's practices. It reflects a broader movement within anthropology towards greater inclusivity, collaboration, and ethical engagement with research subjects.

In conclusion, Clifford Geertz's quote encapsulates the profound evolution of anthropological writing and research practices over the course of the 20th century. The discipline has undergone a significant transformation, marked by a shift towards reflexivity, ethical engagement, and a more nuanced understanding of culture. This ongoing evolution continues to shape the way anthropologists approach their work, striving to represent and understand the complexities of human societies in a more respectful and empathetic manner.